TAN vs. CSIQ

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TAN (Invesco Solar ETF) is Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the MAC Global Solar Energy Index, while CSIQ (Canadian Solar Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TAN returned 9.52%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for CSIQ. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.

Performance

TAN vs. CSIQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAN achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly higher than CSIQ's -36.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TAN has outperformed CSIQ with an annualized return of 9.52%, while CSIQ has yielded a comparatively lower 0.48% annualized return.

TAN

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -12.41%
• 6M: -8.39%
• YTD: 0.43%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: -9.55%
• 5Y*: -10.35%
• 10Y*: 9.52%
• ALL TIME*: -7.13%

CSIQ

• 1D: 2.17%
• 1M: 4.32%
• 6M: -21.15%
• YTD: -36.56%
• 1Y: 33.22%
• 3Y*: -25.16%
• 5Y*: -17.83%
• 10Y*: 0.48%
• ALL TIME*: -0.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CSIQ Canadian Solar Inc.	$29.87M	$33.52M	$47.72M
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	$66.73M	$50.86M	$87.18M

TAN vs. CSIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	0.43%	48.31%	-37.61%	-26.79%	-5.24%	-25.10%	233.96%	66.53%	-25.67%	54.38%
CSIQ Canadian Solar Inc.	-36.56%	113.76%	-57.61%	-15.11%	-1.25%	-38.93%	131.86%	54.11%	-14.95%	38.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TAN and CSIQ is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.75
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2008	0.74

The correlation between TAN and CSIQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TAN vs. CSIQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAN

TAN Risk / Return Rank: 34
TAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
TAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
TAN Omega Ratio Rank: 34
TAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
TAN Martin Ratio Rank: 33

CSIQ

CSIQ Risk / Return Rank: 58
CSIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
CSIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
CSIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 61
CSIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
CSIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAN vs. CSIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) and Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAN	CSIQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.87	0.33	+0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.43	1.10	+0.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.14	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	0.49	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.14	0.80	+2.34

TAN vs. CSIQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAN Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is higher than the CSIQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAN and CSIQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAN vs. CSIQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAN drawdown since its inception was -95.29%, roughly equal to the maximum CSIQ drawdown of -96.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAN and CSIQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAN	CSIQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-95.29%	-96.02%	+0.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.51%	-63.94%	+28.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-58.70%	-80.46%	+21.76%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-73.95%	-85.62%	+11.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.53%	-89.46%	+10.93%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.35%	-76.49%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-78.45%	-61.20%	-17.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.87%	39.35%	-28.48%

Volatility

TAN vs. CSIQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Solar ETF (TAN) is 11.99%, while Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) has a volatility of 20.40%. This indicates that TAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAN	CSIQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.99%	20.40%	-8.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.71%	63.28%	-33.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.21%	96.48%	-57.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.14%	72.35%	-32.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.27%	64.01%	-25.74%

Dividends

TAN vs. CSIQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither TAN nor CSIQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CSIQ Canadian Solar Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TAN Invesco Solar ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.50%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.09%	0.30%	0.69%	1.77%	5.04%	1.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAN and CSIQ in my portfolio?

TAN and CSIQ have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAN or CSIQ?

CSIQ has higher volatility (20.40%) compared to TAN (11.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAN dropped -95.29% vs CSIQ's -96.02%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.