PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CSIQ vs. JKS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CSIQ vs. JKS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CSIQ achieves a -38.03% return, which is significantly lower than JKS's -27.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CSIQ has underperformed JKS with an annualized return of -0.07%, while JKS has yielded a comparatively higher 1.19% annualized return.


CSIQ

1D
-8.05%
1M
-21.98%
YTD
-38.03%
6M
-38.45%
1Y
45.41%
3Y*
-26.40%
5Y*
-17.56%
10Y*
-0.07%

JKS

1D
-3.67%
1M
-17.98%
YTD
-27.32%
6M
-30.75%
1Y
-1.09%
3Y*
-18.80%
5Y*
-9.85%
10Y*
1.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CSIQ vs. JKS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
-38.03%113.76%-57.61%-15.11%-1.25%-38.93%131.86%54.11%-14.95%38.42%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
-27.32%10.30%-27.15%-5.56%-11.05%-25.72%175.10%127.40%-58.88%57.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CSIQ and JKS is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2010

0.68

The correlation between CSIQ and JKS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CSIQ:

$998.95M

JKS:

$226.63M

EPS

CSIQ:

-$1.51

JKS:

-CN¥272.31

PS Ratio

CSIQ:

0.18

JKS:

0.02

PB Ratio

CSIQ:

0.35

JKS:

0.10

Total Revenue (TTM)

CSIQ:

$5.48B

JKS:

CN¥63.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CSIQ:

$1.16B

JKS:

CN¥2.78B

EBITDA (TTM)

CSIQ:

$398.75M

JKS:

-CN¥5.29B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CSIQ vs. JKS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSIQ
CSIQ Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CSIQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSIQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSIQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
CSIQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSIQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

JKS
JKS Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JKS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JKS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
JKS Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JKS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
JKS Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CSIQ vs. JKS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CSIQJKSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.05

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

-0.03

+0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.28

-0.07

+1.35

CSIQ vs. JKS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CSIQ Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the JKS Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CSIQ and JKS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CSIQ vs. JKS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CSIQ drawdown since its inception was -96.02%, roughly equal to the maximum JKS drawdown of -94.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CSIQ and JKS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CSIQJKSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.02%

-94.84%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.94%

-42.90%

-21.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-82.53%

-65.85%

-16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-85.65%

-79.24%

-6.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.46%

-82.09%

-7.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-77.04%

-74.25%

-2.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-61.11%

-51.93%

-9.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

35.54%

16.60%

+18.94%

Volatility

CSIQ vs. JKS - Volatility Comparison

Canadian Solar Inc. (CSIQ) has a higher volatility of 25.54% compared to JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. (JKS) at 18.45%. This indicates that CSIQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JKS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CSIQJKSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.54%

18.45%

+7.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

65.93%

43.99%

+21.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

96.04%

62.00%

+34.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.19%

70.42%

+1.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.78%

70.95%

-7.17%

Dividends

CSIQ vs. JKS - Dividend Comparison

CSIQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JKS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.18%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CSIQ
Canadian Solar Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JKS
JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.
16.18%5.04%6.02%4.06%

Financials

CSIQ vs. JKS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Solar Inc. and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
1.08B
12.25B
(CSIQ) Total Revenue
(JKS) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CSIQ values in USD, JKS values in CNY

CSIQ vs. JKS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Solar Inc. and JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
8.3%
Portfolio components
CSIQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Solar Inc. reported a gross profit of 270.82M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

JKS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 12.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.3%.

CSIQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Solar Inc. reported an operating income of 72.87M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.8%.

JKS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported an operating income of -256.25M and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.1%.

CSIQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Solar Inc. reported a net income of -32.09M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of -3.0%.

JKS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, JinkoSolar Holding Co., Ltd. reported a net income of -463.51M and revenue of 12.25B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CSIQ and JKS have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSIQ has higher volatility (25.54%) compared to JKS (18.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CSIQ dropped -96.02% vs JKS's -94.84%.

CSIQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CSIQ and JKS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer