TALO vs. SNOW
TALO (Talos Energy Inc.) and SNOW (Snowflake Inc.) are both stocks. TALO operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy), while SNOW operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, TALO returned 5.64%/yr vs 1.99%/yr for SNOW. Their 0.11 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TALO vs. SNOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TALO achieves a 37.75% return, which is significantly higher than SNOW's 33.70% return.
TALO
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- 12.69%
- 6M
- 27.35%
- YTD
- 37.75%
- 1Y
- 77.54%
- 3Y*
- -1.68%
- 5Y*
- 5.64%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -9.66%
SNOW
- 1D
- -1.62%
- 1M
- 12.29%
- 6M
- 52.20%
- YTD
- 33.70%
- 1Y
- 31.22%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 1.99%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.11%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | $1.36B | $1.31B | $1.77B |
| $29.89M | $27.79M | $28.88M |
TALO vs. SNOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TALO Talos Energy Inc. | 37.75% | 13.49% | -31.76% | -24.63% | 92.65% | 18.93% | 46.62% |
SNOW Snowflake Inc. | 33.70% | 42.06% | -22.41% | 38.64% | -57.63% | 20.38% | 14.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between TALO and SNOW is 0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2020 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
TALO:
$2.53B
SNOW:
$101.65B
TALO:
-$4.31
SNOW:
-$3.51
TALO:
1.50
SNOW:
19.88
TALO:
1.36
SNOW:
49.16
TALO:
$1.74B
SNOW:
$5.03B
TALO:
$40.64M
SNOW:
$3.38B
TALO:
$480.10M
SNOW:
-$1.21B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TALO vs. SNOW — Risk / Return Rank
TALO
SNOW
TALO vs. SNOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) and Snowflake Inc. (SNOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TALO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.16 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 0.56 | +2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.46 | 1.21 | +8.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TALO vs. SNOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TALO drawdown since its inception was -86.34%, which is greater than SNOW's maximum drawdown of -72.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TALO and SNOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TALO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.34% | -72.99% | -13.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.18% | -56.30% | +34.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.16% | -56.30% | -6.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -74.63% | -72.99% | -1.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -59.49% | -27.02% | -32.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -48.72% | -9.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.35% | 26.11% | -17.76% |
Volatility
TALO vs. SNOW - Volatility Comparison
Talos Energy Inc. (TALO) has a higher volatility of 15.93% compared to Snowflake Inc. (SNOW) at 9.54%. This indicates that TALO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SNOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TALO | SNOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.93% | 9.54% | +6.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.84% | 52.74% | -12.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.93% | 66.43% | -16.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.62% | 62.02% | -6.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.18% | 62.28% | +1.90% |
Dividends
TALO vs. SNOW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TALO nor SNOW has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TALO vs. SNOW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Talos Energy Inc. and Snowflake Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TALO vs. SNOW - Profitability Comparison
TALO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 472.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
SNOW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a gross profit of 926.45M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.
TALO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
SNOW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported an operating income of -326.15M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of -23.5%.
TALO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Talos Energy Inc. reported a net income of -256.17M and revenue of 472.31M, resulting in a net margin of -54.2%.
SNOW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Snowflake Inc. reported a net income of -295.57M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of -21.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TALO and SNOW have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TALO has higher volatility (15.93%) compared to SNOW (9.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TALO dropped -86.34% vs SNOW's -72.99%.
TALO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TALO and SNOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer