TAIL vs. TRIO

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) and TRIO (MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF) are both Equity Hedged funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TAIL returned -11.00% vs 13.07% for TRIO. Their -0.71 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. TAIL charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for TRIO.

Performance

TAIL vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than TRIO's 6.52% return.

TAIL

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -1.69%
• 6M: -7.65%
• YTD: -8.13%
• 1Y: -11.00%
• 3Y*: -4.90%
• 5Y*: -9.07%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -7.28%

TRIO

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 0.57%
• 6M: 5.35%
• YTD: 6.52%
• 1Y: 13.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF	$1.12M	$1.66M	$2.24M
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	$43.78K	$78.89K	$68.56K

TAIL vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF	-8.13%	2.55%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	6.52%	11.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TAIL and TRIO is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	-0.71

The correlation between TAIL and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.71 to -0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TAIL vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TAIL

TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 1
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 2
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

TRIO

TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 84
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TAIL vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TAIL	TRIO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.09	1.94	-3.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.55	2.83	-4.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.82	1.37	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.74	2.77	-3.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.52	13.64	-15.16

TAIL vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIL Sharpe Ratio is -1.09, which is lower than the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIL and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TAIL vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.57%, which is greater than TRIO's maximum drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and TRIO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAIL	TRIO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.57%	-9.88%	-42.69%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.68%	-4.47%	-8.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.20%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.03%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.57%	-0.10%	-52.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-29.50%	-0.75%	-28.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.16%	0.91%	+5.25%

Volatility

TAIL vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) is 1.80%, while MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) has a volatility of 1.93%. This indicates that TAIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAIL	TRIO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.80%	1.93%	-0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.72%	5.17%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.59%	6.39%	+2.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	10.31%	+4.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.84%	10.31%	+4.53%

TAIL vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIL has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

TAIL vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, less than TRIO's 8.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF	2.99%	2.88%	3.48%	3.74%	1.50%	0.49%	0.36%	1.58%	1.52%	0.91%
TRIO MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF	8.46%	9.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TAIL and TRIO in my portfolio?

TAIL and TRIO have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TAIL or TRIO?

TRIO has higher volatility (1.93%) compared to TAIL (1.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIL dropped -52.57% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

Which ETF is better, TAIL or TRIO?

On 1-year performance, TRIO leads with 13.07% vs -11.00% for TAIL. On fees, TAIL is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 1.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TAIL or TRIO?

Over the 1-year period, TRIO has performed better with a 13.07% return vs -11.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TAIL or TRIO?

TAIL is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TRIO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TAIL or TRIO?

TRIO has the higher dividend yield at 8.46%, compared with 2.99% for TAIL.

What is the main difference between TAIL and TRIO?

They also come from different issuers: Cambria and McCarthy & Cox. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for TAIL and 0.70% for TRIO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.