TAIL vs. BLDG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG).

TAIL and BLDG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TAIL is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Apr 5, 2017. BLDG is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Sep 24, 2020.

Performance

TAIL vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

TAIL vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF	2.59%	5.48%	-9.62%	-13.29%	-13.13%	-12.81%	-5.88%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	-0.94%	4.26%	8.18%	1.76%	-14.66%	22.47%	15.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIL achieves a 2.59% return, which is significantly higher than BLDG's -0.94% return.

TAIL

• 1D: -2.50%
• 1M: 0.62%
• YTD: 2.59%
• 6M: 0.83%
• 1Y: 2.58%
• 3Y*: -4.32%
• 5Y*: -6.79%
• 10Y*: —

BLDG

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -8.62%
• YTD: -0.94%
• 6M: -3.58%
• 1Y: 6.03%
• 3Y*: 5.67%
• 5Y*: 2.25%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAIL vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TAIL and BLDG have an expense ratio of 0.59%.

TAIL

Cambria Tail Risk ETF

BLDG

Cambria Global Real Estate ETF

Return for Risk

TAIL vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIL

TAIL Risk / Return Rank: 16
TAIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TAIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TAIL Omega Ratio Rank: 19
TAIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TAIL Martin Ratio Rank: 14

BLDG

BLDG Risk / Return Rank: 26
BLDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
BLDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Omega Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
BLDG Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIL vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TAIL	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	0.46	-0.31
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	0.71	-0.33
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.09	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	0.55	-0.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.19	2.04	-1.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TAIL vs. BLDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIL Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the BLDG Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIL and BLDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TAIL	BLDG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	0.46	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.46	0.15	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.43	0.38	-0.80

Correlation

The correlation between TAIL and BLDG is -0.35. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

TAIL vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison

TAIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than BLDG's 6.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF	3.20%	2.88%	3.48%	3.74%	1.50%	0.49%	0.36%	1.58%	1.52%	0.91%
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF	6.12%	7.46%	7.97%	4.99%	3.99%	10.40%	0.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

TAIL vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIL drawdown since its inception was -52.36%, which is greater than BLDG's maximum drawdown of -27.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIL and BLDG.

Drawdown Indicators

	TAIL	BLDG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.36%	-27.25%	-25.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.24%	-10.80%	-5.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.44%	-27.25%	-11.19%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.03%	-8.96%	-38.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.70%	-9.44%	-19.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.27%	2.93%	+10.34%

Volatility

TAIL vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG) have volatilities of 4.39% and 4.20%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TAIL	BLDG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.39%	4.20%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.04%	7.38%	-0.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.81%	13.30%	+4.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.89%	15.24%	-0.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.06%	15.61%	-0.55%