PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAIAX vs. ANCFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAIAX achieves a 6.28% return, which is significantly lower than ANCFX's 15.14% return. Over the past 10 years, TAIAX has underperformed ANCFX with an annualized return of 7.85%, while ANCFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.90% annualized return.


TAIAX

1D
0.34%
1M
2.87%
YTD
6.28%
6M
6.84%
1Y
16.67%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
7.00%
10Y*
7.85%

ANCFX

1D
0.00%
1M
5.89%
YTD
15.14%
6M
16.14%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
26.09%
5Y*
14.91%
10Y*
14.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
6.28%13.27%10.09%11.74%-10.18%13.47%7.46%16.26%-2.17%14.25%
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
15.14%24.21%22.73%25.86%-16.66%22.43%14.92%27.07%-8.13%22.80%

Correlation

The correlation between TAIAX and ANCFX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2012

0.93

The correlation between TAIAX and ANCFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAIAX vs. ANCFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAIAX
TAIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
TAIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TAIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

ANCFX
ANCFX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ANCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ANCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
ANCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ANCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ANCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) and American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAIAXANCFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.65

2.58

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.75

3.47

+0.29

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.47

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.33

-0.58

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.72

15.41

-2.70

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the ANCFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAIAX and ANCFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAIAXANCFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.65

2.58

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.89

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

0.84

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.64

+0.42

Drawdowns

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAIAX drawdown since its inception was -21.42%, smaller than the maximum ANCFX drawdown of -53.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAIAX and ANCFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAIAXANCFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.42%

-53.29%

+31.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.16%

-10.66%

+4.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.75%

-17.97%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.76%

-25.07%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.42%

-33.93%

+12.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-7.32%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.30%

-0.97%

Volatility

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio (TAIAX) is 2.01%, while American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A (ANCFX) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that TAIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ANCFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAIAXANCFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.01%

3.68%

-1.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.30%

10.82%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

13.75%

-7.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.62%

16.80%

-9.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.19%

17.73%

-9.54%

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAIAX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than ANCFX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAIAX vs. ANCFX - Dividend Comparison

TAIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.87%, less than ANCFX's 7.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ANCFX
American Funds Fundamental Investors Class A
7.43%8.54%8.90%5.80%4.98%10.97%2.61%6.91%9.31%7.28%4.71%6.08%
TAIAX
American Funds Tax-Aware Conservative Growth and Income Portfolio
4.87%5.18%5.16%4.29%4.37%3.40%2.65%4.01%4.54%4.04%2.77%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TAIAX and ANCFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ANCFX has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to TAIAX (2.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAIAX dropped -21.42% vs ANCFX's -53.29%.

TAIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAIAX and ANCFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer