PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TAGRX vs. TACAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock California Municipal Bond Fund (TACAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TAGRX achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly higher than TACAX's 2.04% return. Over the past 10 years, TAGRX has outperformed TACAX with an annualized return of 12.60%, while TACAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.12% annualized return.


TAGRX

1D
-0.85%
1M
1.36%
YTD
3.25%
6M
3.31%
1Y
16.44%
3Y*
16.21%
5Y*
8.66%
10Y*
12.60%

TACAX

1D
0.30%
1M
1.14%
YTD
2.04%
6M
2.37%
1Y
8.80%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.15%
10Y*
2.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
3.25%9.98%21.14%32.23%-24.86%29.16%20.55%35.06%-14.09%19.63%
TACAX
John Hancock California Municipal Bond Fund
2.04%3.05%2.32%7.28%-9.13%2.32%3.70%7.71%0.43%6.11%

Correlation

The correlation between TAGRX and TACAX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

-0.00

The correlation between TAGRX and TACAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TAGRX vs. TACAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TAGRX
TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

TACAX
TACAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
TACAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TACAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TACAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TACAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
TACAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) and John Hancock California Municipal Bond Fund (TACAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TAGRXTACAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.53

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.36

-1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

8.02

-3.77

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TAGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the TACAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TAGRX and TACAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TAGRXTACAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

2.27

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.22

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.45

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

1.19

-0.71

Drawdowns

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TAGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.45%, which is greater than TACAX's maximum drawdown of -15.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAGRX and TACAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TAGRXTACAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.45%

-15.80%

-42.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.04%

-3.69%

-10.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.11%

-8.55%

-17.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.10%

-15.09%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.96%

-15.09%

-21.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.23%

-0.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.54%

-2.02%

-9.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

1.08%

+2.93%

Volatility

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a higher volatility of 2.75% compared to John Hancock California Municipal Bond Fund (TACAX) at 1.41%. This indicates that TAGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TACAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TAGRXTACAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

1.41%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.56%

2.80%

+6.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.50%

3.87%

+8.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.18%

5.28%

+14.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

4.70%

+15.80%

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TAGRX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than TACAX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

TAGRX vs. TACAX - Dividend Comparison

TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.71%, more than TACAX's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TACAX
John Hancock California Municipal Bond Fund
3.82%4.64%3.09%2.40%2.93%3.04%2.86%4.16%3.51%3.48%3.64%3.66%
TAGRX
John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund
11.71%12.09%13.00%6.67%6.76%7.82%0.30%0.53%14.05%8.22%2.96%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


TAGRX and TACAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TAGRX has higher volatility (2.75%) compared to TACAX (1.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TAGRX dropped -58.45% vs TACAX's -15.80%.

TACAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TAGRX and TACAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer