TAFI vs. ZMUN
TAFI (AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF) and ZMUN (F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. TAFI is actively managed, while ZMUN is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TAFI charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for ZMUN.
Performance
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TAFI achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than ZMUN's 1.59% return.
TAFI
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.46%
- 1Y
- 4.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.68%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZMUN
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TAFI AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF | 1.11% | 0.56% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 1.59% | 0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between TAFI and ZMUN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TAFI vs. ZMUN — Risk / Return Rank
TAFI
ZMUN
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF (TAFI) and F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF (ZMUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TAFI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.57 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.99 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TAFI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.72 | 6.55 | -4.84 |
Drawdowns
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TAFI drawdown since its inception was -2.00%, which is greater than ZMUN's maximum drawdown of -0.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TAFI and ZMUN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TAFI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.00% | -0.09% | -1.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.21% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | 0.00% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -0.01% | -0.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.34% | — | — |
Volatility
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TAFI | ZMUN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.95% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47% | 0.54% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 0.54% | +1.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.98% | 0.54% | +1.44% |
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TAFI has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ZMUN's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
TAFI vs. ZMUN - Dividend Comparison
TAFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%, more than ZMUN's 2.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TAFI AB Tax-Aware Short Duration ETF | 3.15% | 3.21% | 3.34% | 3.27% | 0.79% |
ZMUN F/m Ultrashort Tax-Free Municipal ETF | 2.28% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TAFI and ZMUN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAFI is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAFI is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ZMUN.
TAFI has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 2.28% for ZMUN.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for TAFI and 0.30% for ZMUN.
Find the right allocation for TAFI and ZMUN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer