PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TransAlta Corporation (TA-PJ.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TA-PJ.TO achieves a 2.83% return, which is significantly lower than EMA-PC.TO's 5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, TA-PJ.TO has outperformed EMA-PC.TO with an annualized return of 12.31%, while EMA-PC.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.95% annualized return.


TA-PJ.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
2.15%
YTD
2.83%
6M
3.51%
1Y
10.19%
3Y*
17.95%
5Y*
9.01%
10Y*
12.31%

EMA-PC.TO

1D
0.70%
1M
0.35%
YTD
5.77%
6M
5.68%
1Y
13.37%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
7.95%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TA-PJ.TO
TransAlta Corporation
2.83%17.42%28.47%2.13%-9.51%33.30%13.81%7.17%-13.49%21.06%
EMA-PC.TO
Emera Incorporated
5.77%15.47%23.62%16.61%-18.92%44.17%3.84%-7.46%-8.81%17.30%

Correlation

The correlation between TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 2014

0.22

The correlation between TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.24 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TransAlta Corporation

Emera Incorporated

Often compared with EMA-PC.TO:
EMA-PC.TO vs. PFAE.TOEMA-PC.TO vs. BCE-PB.TO

Return for Risk

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TA-PJ.TO
TA-PJ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
TA-PJ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TA-PJ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TA-PJ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TA-PJ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
TA-PJ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

EMA-PC.TO
EMA-PC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
EMA-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMA-PC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TransAlta Corporation (TA-PJ.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TA-PJ.TOEMA-PC.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

4.89

+1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.14

17.51

-2.37

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TA-PJ.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the EMA-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TA-PJ.TOEMA-PC.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

1.95

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.54

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.60

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.35

+0.06

Drawdowns

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TA-PJ.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.77%, which is greater than EMA-PC.TO's maximum drawdown of -45.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TA-PJ.TOEMA-PC.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.77%

-45.60%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.70%

-2.80%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.51%

-13.29%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.94%

-26.10%

+8.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.16%

-45.60%

-2.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

0.00%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.01%

-8.96%

-2.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.68%

0.78%

-0.10%

Volatility

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TransAlta Corporation (TA-PJ.TO) is 1.20%, while Emera Incorporated (EMA-PC.TO) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that TA-PJ.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMA-PC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TA-PJ.TOEMA-PC.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.20%

2.01%

-0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.02%

4.04%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.81%

7.05%

-1.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.83%

14.86%

-4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.77%

16.59%

-0.82%

Dividends

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Dividend Comparison

TA-PJ.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than EMA-PC.TO's 6.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMA-PC.TO
Emera Incorporated
6.19%6.34%6.85%6.29%6.29%4.83%6.60%6.40%5.02%4.22%4.73%5.20%
TA-PJ.TO
TransAlta Corporation
6.52%6.48%5.72%6.36%6.10%5.22%6.58%7.26%7.32%5.96%6.78%8.92%

Financials

TA-PJ.TO vs. EMA-PC.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TransAlta Corporation and Emera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.47B
(TA-PJ.TO) Total Revenue
(EMA-PC.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TA-PJ.TO and EMA-PC.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer