PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
T vs. XLK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

T vs. XLK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AT&T Inc. (T) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -11.25% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 27.85% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed XLK with an annualized return of 1.68%, while XLK has yielded a comparatively higher 24.66% annualized return.


T

1D
-1.25%
1M
-8.55%
6M
-6.48%
YTD
-11.25%
1Y
-17.96%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
1.68%

XLK

1D
1.29%
1M
-0.52%
6M
25.66%
YTD
27.85%
1Y
44.41%
3Y*
28.63%
5Y*
20.22%
10Y*
24.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

T vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
T
AT&T Inc.
-11.25%13.97%44.08%-2.74%5.76%-8.09%-21.37%45.55%-22.25%-4.01%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
27.85%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%

Correlation

The correlation between T and XLK is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998

0.36

The correlation between T and XLK shifts across timeframes, from -0.35 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

T vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

T
T Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
T Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
T Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
T Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
T Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
T Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

T vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXLKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.88

1.31

-0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

2.80

-3.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.43

8.44

-9.87

T vs. XLK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current T Sharpe Ratio is -0.77, which is lower than the XLK Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of T and XLK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

T vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and XLK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXLKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.15%

-82.05%

+17.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.89%

-15.92%

-12.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.89%

-25.66%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.01%

-33.56%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.35%

-33.56%

-8.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.12%

-7.25%

-17.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-34.84%

+19.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.62%

5.27%

+7.35%

Volatility

T vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison

AT&T Inc. (T) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) have volatilities of 10.03% and 10.45%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXLKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.03%

10.45%

-0.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.84%

20.77%

-0.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.51%

24.41%

-0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.37%

25.56%

-1.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.90%

24.79%

-0.89%

Dividends

T vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison

T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
T
AT&T Inc.
5.22%4.47%4.87%6.62%6.66%8.46%7.23%5.22%7.01%5.04%4.51%5.46%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.43%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


T and XLK have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to T (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs XLK's -82.05%.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for T and XLK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer