T vs. WMT
T (AT&T Inc.) and WMT (Walmart Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while WMT operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.33%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for WMT. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. WMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -2.96% return, which is significantly lower than WMT's 9.07% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed WMT with an annualized return of 3.33%, while WMT has yielded a comparatively higher 19.77% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 2.52%
- 1M
- -4.69%
- YTD
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -1.93%
- 1Y
- -12.96%
- 3Y*
- 20.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.33%
WMT
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.93%
- YTD
- 9.07%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 28.71%
- 3Y*
- 34.18%
- 5Y*
- 22.42%
- 10Y*
- 19.77%
T vs. WMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -2.96% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 9.07% | 24.49% | 73.99% | 12.88% | -0.46% | 1.97% | 23.32% | 30.16% | -3.43% | 46.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and WMT is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 1984 | 0.32 |
The correlation between T and WMT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$3.04
WMT:
$2.88
T:
7.74
WMT:
42.04
T:
0.32
WMT:
2.75
T:
1.35
WMT:
1.34
T:
$125.65B
WMT:
$725.31B
T:
$105.41B
WMT:
$181.16B
T:
$54.70B
WMT:
$44.32B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. WMT — Risk / Return Rank
T
WMT
T vs. WMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Walmart Inc. (WMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.23 | -0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 1.83 | -2.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | 5.82 | -7.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. WMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum WMT drawdown of -77.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and WMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -77.14% | +12.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.87% | -15.75% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.87% | -21.93% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -25.74% | -6.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -25.74% | -16.61% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.12% | -9.81% | -8.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.72% | -14.63% | -1.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.64% | 4.94% | +5.70% |
Volatility
T vs. WMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AT&T Inc. (T) is 8.21%, while Walmart Inc. (WMT) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that T experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | WMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 9.86% | -1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.80% | 18.49% | -0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 23.67% | -1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.01% | 21.68% | +2.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.73% | 21.73% | +2.00% |
Dividends
T vs. WMT - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than WMT's 0.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | 4.71% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
WMT Walmart Inc. | 0.80% | 0.84% | 0.92% | 1.45% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.78% | 2.23% | 2.07% | 2.89% | 3.20% |
Financials
T vs. WMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Walmart Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and WMT have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to T (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs WMT's -77.14%.
WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and WMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer