T vs. NTR
T (AT&T Inc.) and NTR (Nutrien Ltd.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while NTR operates in Agricultural Inputs (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, T returned 7.13%/yr vs 5.94%/yr for NTR. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. NTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a -7.04% return, which is significantly lower than NTR's 9.77% return.
T
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- YTD
- -7.04%
- 1Y
- -13.37%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.13%
- 10Y*
- 2.10%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
NTR
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 7.01%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- YTD
- 9.77%
- 1Y
- 14.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 5.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.61%
T vs. NTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | -7.04% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% |
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 9.77% | 43.33% | -16.97% | -20.19% | 0.23% | 60.78% | 5.60% | 5.57% | -7.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and NTR is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2018 | 0.22 |
The correlation between T and NTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.22 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$152.52B
NTR:
$32.00B
T:
$3.05
NTR:
$4.94
T:
7.19
NTR:
13.49
T:
0.30
NTR:
0.20
T:
1.25
NTR:
1.16
T:
$125.65B
NTR:
$27.76B
T:
$105.41B
NTR:
$8.66B
T:
$54.70B
NTR:
$6.33B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. NTR — Risk / Return Rank
T
NTR
T vs. NTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Nutrien Ltd. (NTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.10 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 0.55 | -1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.03 | 1.43 | -2.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. NTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, which is greater than NTR's maximum drawdown of -57.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and NTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -57.80% | -6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -27.56% | -1.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.89% | -32.82% | +3.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -57.80% | +25.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.57% | -31.70% | +10.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -26.26% | +10.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 10.47% | +2.47% |
Volatility
T vs. NTR - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to Nutrien Ltd. (NTR) at 8.49%. This indicates that T's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | NTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.59% | 8.49% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.91% | 24.62% | -4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.72% | 32.14% | -8.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.38% | 34.17% | -9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 33.93% | -10.01% |
Dividends
T vs. NTR - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.58%, more than NTR's 3.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTR Nutrien Ltd. | 3.29% | 3.53% | 4.83% | 3.76% | 3.51% | 2.45% | 3.74% | 3.67% | 3.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
T AT&T Inc. | 6.58% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. NTR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Nutrien Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
T and NTR have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to NTR (8.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs NTR's -57.80%.
NTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.47 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and NTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer