T vs. GILD
T (AT&T Inc.) and GILD (Gilead Sciences, Inc.) are both stocks. T operates in Telecom Services (Communication Services), while GILD operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, T returned 3.24%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for GILD. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
T vs. GILD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, T achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than GILD's 6.65% return. Over the past 10 years, T has underperformed GILD with an annualized return of 3.24%, while GILD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.56% annualized return.
T
- 1D
- 5.10%
- 1M
- 11.00%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- -8.11%
- 3Y*
- 24.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.99%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.59%
GILD
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- 3.32%
- 6M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- 6.65%
- 1Y
- 17.21%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 18.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $775.03M | $964.29M | $981.41M | |
| $2.14B | $1.98B | $1.37B |
T vs. GILD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T AT&T Inc. | 2.19% | 13.97% | 44.08% | -2.74% | 5.76% | -8.09% | -21.37% | 45.55% | -22.25% | -4.01% |
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 6.65% | 36.59% | 18.68% | -1.99% | 23.63% | 29.95% | -6.70% | 7.88% | -9.92% | 2.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between T and GILD is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1992 | 0.20 |
The correlation between T and GILD shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.26 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
T:
$165.35B
GILD:
$160.55B
T:
$3.03
GILD:
$7.35
T:
7.96
GILD:
17.59
T:
0.33
GILD:
0.04
T:
1.34
GILD:
5.45
T:
1.33
GILD:
6.90
T:
$127.24B
GILD:
$29.74B
T:
$112.60B
GILD:
$18.74B
T:
$49.53B
GILD:
$12.88B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
T vs. GILD — Risk / Return Rank
T
GILD
T vs. GILD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AT&T Inc. (T) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| T | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.13 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.28 | 0.80 | -1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.62 | 1.86 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
T vs. GILD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum T drawdown since its inception was -64.15%, smaller than the maximum GILD drawdown of -70.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for T and GILD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| T | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -64.15% | -70.83% | +6.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.89% | -21.59% | -7.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.89% | -26.59% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.01% | -26.59% | -5.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.35% | -30.47% | -11.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.78% | -15.98% | +2.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.74% | -22.13% | +6.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.13% | 9.27% | +3.86% |
Volatility
T vs. GILD - Volatility Comparison
AT&T Inc. (T) and Gilead Sciences, Inc. (GILD) have volatilities of 10.42% and 10.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| T | GILD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.42% | 10.10% | +0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.83% | 19.50% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.44% | 27.12% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.53% | 24.52% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 25.59% | -1.60% |
Dividends
T vs. GILD - Dividend Comparison
T's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.99%, more than GILD's 2.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GILD Gilead Sciences, Inc. | 2.49% | 2.57% | 3.33% | 3.70% | 3.40% | 3.91% | 4.67% | 3.88% | 3.65% | 2.90% | 2.57% | 1.27% |
T AT&T Inc. | 5.99% | 4.47% | 4.87% | 6.62% | 6.66% | 8.46% | 7.23% | 5.22% | 7.01% | 5.04% | 4.51% | 5.46% |
Financials
T vs. GILD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AT&T Inc. and Gilead Sciences, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
T vs. GILD - Profitability Comparison
T - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a gross profit of 25.25B and revenue of 31.56B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.0%.
GILD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a gross profit of 79.20M and revenue of 6.96B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.1%.
T - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported an operating income of 7.04B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.
GILD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.59B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
T - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AT&T Inc. reported a net income of 4.59B and revenue of 31.56B, resulting in a net margin of 14.6%.
GILD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gilead Sciences, Inc. reported a net income of 2.02B and revenue of 6.96B, resulting in a net margin of 29.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
T and GILD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
T has higher volatility (10.42%) compared to GILD (10.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, T dropped -64.15% vs GILD's -70.83%.
GILD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.64 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for T and GILD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer