SZNE vs. SIXA

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SZNE is passively managed, while SIXA is actively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for SIXA.

Performance

SZNE vs. SIXA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SZNE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SIXA

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 0.43%
• 6M: 12.74%
• YTD: 14.28%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 20.55%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SZNE vs. SIXA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	9.68%	-3.44%	2.05%	6.53%	-12.33%	26.36%	26.90%
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	14.28%	15.52%	22.70%	11.98%	-5.72%	23.87%	19.04%

Correlation

The correlation between SZNE and SIXA is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2020	0.77

The correlation between SZNE and SIXA shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SZNE vs. SIXA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SZNE	SIXA
Financial Services	38.7%	7.7%
Industrials	13.0%	6.5%
Energy	9.3%	4.8%
Technology	5.6%	19.2%
Healthcare	5.1%	14.5%
Utilities	5.0%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	3.7%	3.9%
Communication Services	2.9%	13.9%
Real Estate	2.2%	1.3%
Basic Materials	1.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.3%	23.2%

Return for Risk

SZNE vs. SIXA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SZNE

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIXA

SIXA Risk / Return Rank: 80
SIXA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SIXA Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SIXA Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SIXA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
SIXA Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SZNE vs. SIXA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SZNE	SIXA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.03	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.04	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.25	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	12.31	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	SZNE	SIXA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-18.38%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-5.59%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-2.96%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SZNE	SIXA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.46%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.95%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	8.92%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	12.78%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	13.29%	—

SZNE vs. SIXA - Expense Ratio Comparison

SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXA's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

SZNE vs. SIXA - Dividend Comparison

SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than SIXA's 2.00% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF	2.00%	2.31%	1.62%	2.12%	2.23%	1.63%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF	1.23%	1.47%	1.20%	1.21%	1.11%	0.79%	1.37%	0.90%	0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SZNE and SIXA in my portfolio?

SZNE and SIXA have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SZNE or SIXA?

On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SZNE or SIXA?

SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SZNE or SIXA?

SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 1.23% for SZNE.

What is the main difference between SZNE and SIXA?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.86% for SIXA.