SZNE vs. NRSH
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - SZNE tracks the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index while NRSH tracks the Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. Both are passively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SZNE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for NRSH.
Performance
SZNE vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZNE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- 6M
- 23.70%
- YTD
- 33.68%
- 1Y
- 47.62%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.76%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $195.73K | $103.64K | $72.69K |
SZNE vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 8.39% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 33.68% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 9.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and NRSH is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SZNE and NRSH shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SZNE vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
NRSH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
SZNE
NRSH
Financial Services
SZNE
NRSH
-
Industrials
SZNE
NRSH
Healthcare
SZNE
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
NRSH
-
Energy
SZNE
NRSH
Communication Services
SZNE
NRSH
-
Real Estate
SZNE
NRSH
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
NRSH
-
Basic Materials
SZNE
NRSH
-
Utilities
SZNE
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
NRSH
SZNE vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZNE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.28 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.40 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 11.69 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -24.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -10.20% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.58% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.01% | — |
Volatility
SZNE vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.12% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 27.47% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 22.50% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 22.50% | — |
SZNE vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZNE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NRSH's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZNE vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than NRSH's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.31% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.23% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and NRSH have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SZNE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SZNE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for NRSH.
SZNE has the higher dividend yield at 1.23%, compared with 0.31% for NRSH.
SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while NRSH tracks Aztlan North America Nearshoring Price Return Index - Benchmark Price Return. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Aztlan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SZNE and 0.75% for NRSH.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer