SZNE vs. INDS
SZNE (Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SZNE is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SZNE returned 1.44%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for INDS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
SZNE vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SZNE achieves a 9.68% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.59% return.
SZNE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 9.68%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 12.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.38%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- —
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
SZNE vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 9.68% | -3.44% | 2.05% | 6.53% | -12.33% | 26.36% | 4.03% | 35.75% | -6.90% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 54.61% | 12.62% | 42.25% | -1.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZNE and INDS is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SZNE and INDS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
SZNE vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SZNE
INDS
Consumer Cyclical
-
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
SZNE
INDS
-
Technology
SZNE
INDS
-
Industrials
SZNE
INDS
-
Basic Materials
SZNE
INDS
-
Communication Services
SZNE
INDS
-
Energy
SZNE
INDS
-
Utilities
SZNE
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
SZNE
-
INDS
-
Financial Services
SZNE
-
INDS
-
Healthcare
SZNE
-
INDS
-
Real Estate
SZNE
-
INDS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZNE vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
SZNE
INDS
SZNE vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SZNE | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 0.81 | +0.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.14 | 2.44 | +2.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SZNE | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.61 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.04 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.38 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
SZNE vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZNE drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, roughly equal to the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZNE and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZNE | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.79% | -40.17% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.92% | -12.23% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.92% | -26.96% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.92% | -40.17% | +17.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -20.51% | +19.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -15.57% | +8.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.04% | 4.04% | -1.00% |
Volatility
SZNE vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF (SZNE) is 2.73%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that SZNE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZNE | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.73% | 5.23% | -2.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | 12.10% | -0.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 16.23% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.98% | 20.16% | -3.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.10% | 23.11% | -3.01% |
SZNE vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SZNE and INDS have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
SZNE vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
SZNE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than INDS's 3.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% |
SZNE Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation ETF | 1.37% | 1.47% | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.11% | 0.79% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 0.68% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZNE and INDS have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to SZNE (2.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SZNE dropped -39.79% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, SZNE leads with 1.44% vs 0.82% for INDS. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, SZNE has been the lower-risk option at 2.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SZNE has performed better with a 1.44% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SZNE and INDS have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 1.37% for SZNE.
SZNE is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while INDS is REIT. SZNE tracks Pacer CFRA-Stovall Equal Weight Seasonal Rotation Index, while INDS tracks Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index.
SZNE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SZNE and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer