SZK vs. BRKL
SZK (ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods) and BRKL (Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. SZK is passively managed, while BRKL is actively managed. Their -0.54 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. SZK charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for BRKL.
Performance
SZK vs. BRKL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SZK
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -3.10%
- 6M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -18.22%
- 1Y
- -11.75%
- 3Y*
- -6.63%
- 5Y*
- -4.12%
- 10Y*
- -16.27%
- ALL TIME*
- -19.52%
BRKL
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.20K | $16.10K | $16.10K | |
| $56.40K | $61.28K | $43.80K |
SZK vs. BRKL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | -3.10% |
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 4.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SZK and BRKL is -0.54, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2026 | -0.54 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SZK vs. BRKL — Risk / Return Rank
SZK
BRKL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SZK vs. BRKL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods (SZK) and Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF (BRKL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SZK | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.77 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SZK vs. BRKL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SZK drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, which is greater than BRKL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SZK and BRKL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SZK | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -7.03% | -92.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.81% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -86.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.31% | 0.00% | -99.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -82.13% | -3.57% | -78.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.39% | — | — |
Volatility
SZK vs. BRKL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SZK | BRKL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.39% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.80% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.20% | 29.20% | -1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.97% | 29.20% | +2.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.77% | 29.20% | +4.57% |
SZK vs. BRKL - Expense Ratio Comparison
SZK has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BRKL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
SZK vs. BRKL - Dividend Comparison
SZK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, while BRKL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BRKL Corgi BRKB 2x Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SZK ProShares UltraShort Consumer Goods | 2.81% | 2.90% | 5.70% | 4.03% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 1.70% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SZK and BRKL have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BRKL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BRKL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SZK.
SZK has the higher dividend yield at 2.81%, compared with 0.00% for BRKL.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Corgi. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SZK and 0.45% for BRKL.
Find the right allocation for SZK and BRKL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer