PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYSB vs. HTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYSB vs. HTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Systematic Bond ETF (SYSB) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYSB achieves a 0.24% return, which is significantly lower than HTRB's 0.35% return.


SYSB

1D
0.18%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.24%
6M
0.32%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
6.74%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
2.31%

HTRB

1D
0.09%
1M
0.20%
YTD
0.35%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.14%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYSB vs. HTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYSB
iShares Systematic Bond ETF
0.24%8.32%6.04%8.22%-13.57%-1.00%3.31%10.03%-0.93%-0.01%
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
0.35%7.38%2.35%7.15%-14.36%-0.80%8.87%10.39%-0.88%1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between SYSB and HTRB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2017

0.68

Over the past year, SYSB and HTRB have become more correlated (0.88) than their long-term average of 0.68, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYSB vs. HTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYSB
SYSB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SYSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYSB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SYSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYSB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

HTRB
HTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
HTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
HTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYSB vs. HTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Systematic Bond ETF (SYSB) and Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYSBHTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.24

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

1.83

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

5.41

+0.09

SYSB vs. HTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYSB Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the HTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYSB and HTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYSBHTRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.36

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.07

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.40

+0.11

Drawdowns

SYSB vs. HTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYSB drawdown since its inception was -18.47%, smaller than the maximum HTRB drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYSB and HTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYSBHTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.47%

-19.48%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-2.82%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.08%

-6.52%

+3.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.47%

-19.48%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-1.46%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.27%

-4.81%

+1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.98%

0.95%

+0.03%

Volatility

SYSB vs. HTRB - Volatility Comparison

iShares Systematic Bond ETF (SYSB) has a higher volatility of 1.40% compared to Hartford Total Return Bond ETF (HTRB) at 1.28%. This indicates that SYSB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYSBHTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.40%

1.28%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

2.73%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.80%

3.85%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.63%

6.12%

-0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.95%

5.57%

-0.62%

SYSB vs. HTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SYSB has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HTRB's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

SYSB vs. HTRB - Dividend Comparison

SYSB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, which matches HTRB's 4.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HTRB
Hartford Total Return Bond ETF
4.63%4.66%4.45%3.87%3.08%4.22%4.79%6.30%2.37%0.96%0.00%0.00%
SYSB
iShares Systematic Bond ETF
4.61%4.78%5.04%4.44%3.27%1.92%2.57%3.27%3.61%2.74%2.92%2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYSB and HTRB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYSB has higher volatility (1.40%) compared to HTRB (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYSB dropped -18.47% vs HTRB's -19.48%.

On 5-year performance, SYSB leads with 1.57% vs 0.42% for HTRB. On fees, SYSB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HTRB has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SYSB has performed better with a 1.57% return vs 0.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYSB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for HTRB.

HTRB has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 4.61% for SYSB.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for SYSB and 0.29% for HTRB.

SYSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYSB and HTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer