SYLD vs. USFR
SYLD (Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF) and USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - SYLD is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Cambria, while USFR is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. SYLD is actively managed, while USFR is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SYLD returned 13.04%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for USFR. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SYLD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for USFR.
Performance
SYLD vs. USFR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 14.24% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 13.04%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.
SYLD
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 14.24%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- 1Y
- 27.88%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.90%
- 10Y*
- 13.04%
USFR
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.96%
- 1Y
- 3.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.67%
- 10Y*
- 2.47%
SYLD vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 14.24% | 3.94% | 3.37% | 16.46% | -6.14% | 48.59% | 13.61% | 26.98% | -13.51% | 20.03% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 1.58% | 4.23% | 5.47% | 5.18% | 1.98% | -0.03% | 0.56% | 2.02% | 2.01% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYLD and USFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014 | 0.00 |
The correlation between SYLD and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.00 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYLD vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank
SYLD
USFR
SYLD vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 14.83 | -13.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.74 | 48.59 | -45.85 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 12.58 | -11.27 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 203.63 | -199.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.87 | 767.72 | -756.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 14.83 | -13.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 9.27 | -8.98 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 3.07 | -2.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 1.60 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
SYLD vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and USFR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.36% | -1.36% | -44.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.93% | -0.02% | -6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.62% | -0.06% | -26.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.62% | -0.18% | -26.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.36% | -0.80% | -44.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.66% | -0.16% | -5.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 0.01% | +2.54% |
Volatility
SYLD vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) has a higher volatility of 3.24% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that SYLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYLD | USFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.24% | 0.06% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 0.18% | +9.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.54% | 0.27% | +15.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.62% | 0.40% | +20.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.96% | 0.81% | +22.15% |
SYLD vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYLD vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison
SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SYLD Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.86% | 2.25% | 2.04% | 1.92% | 2.20% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 2.08% | 2.52% | 1.57% | 1.92% | 6.93% |
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund | 3.91% | 4.15% | 5.17% | 5.12% | 1.78% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 2.08% | 1.67% | 1.03% | 0.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYLD and USFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SYLD has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs USFR's -1.36%.
On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 13.04% vs 2.47% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.06%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 13.04% return vs 2.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SYLD.
USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 1.86% for SYLD.
SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while USFR is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Cambria and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SYLD and 0.15% for USFR.
USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.83 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYLD and USFR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer