PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SYLD vs. FYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SYLD vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SYLD achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 18.51% return. Over the past 10 years, SYLD has outperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 12.98%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively lower 11.35% annualized return.


SYLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
0.34%
YTD
13.63%
6M
12.35%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
13.47%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
12.98%

FYLD

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.58%
YTD
18.51%
6M
19.88%
1Y
39.75%
3Y*
22.34%
5Y*
11.38%
10Y*
11.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SYLD vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
13.63%3.94%3.37%16.46%-6.14%48.59%13.61%26.98%-13.51%20.03%
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
18.51%34.53%3.00%13.18%-5.53%18.67%4.17%17.83%-14.47%29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SYLD and FYLD is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2013

0.66

The correlation between SYLD and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.69 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SYLD vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SYLD
FYLD

Consumer Cyclical

22.9%
7.3%

Financial Services

22.7%
18.9%

Energy

17.7%
32.7%

Industrials

8.1%
16.1%

Basic Materials

7.9%
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
5.7%

Communication Services

6.0%
4.1%

Healthcare

5.6%

-

Technology

2.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

SYLD
22.9%
FYLD
7.3%

Financial Services

SYLD
22.7%
FYLD
18.9%

Energy

SYLD
17.7%
FYLD
32.7%

Industrials

SYLD
8.1%
FYLD
16.1%

Basic Materials

SYLD
7.9%
FYLD
9.4%

Consumer Defensive

SYLD
6.8%
FYLD
5.7%

Communication Services

SYLD
6.0%
FYLD
4.1%

Healthcare

SYLD
5.6%
FYLD

-

Technology

SYLD
2.3%
FYLD
4.2%

Real Estate

SYLD

-

FYLD

-

Utilities

SYLD

-

FYLD
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SYLD vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SYLD
SYLD Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
SYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FYLD
FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SYLD vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SYLDFYLDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.65

3.48

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.54

4.75

-2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.62

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

7.35

-3.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.02

26.30

-16.27

SYLD vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SYLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SYLD and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SYLDFYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

3.48

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.71

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

0.63

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Drawdowns

SYLD vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SYLD drawdown since its inception was -45.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYLD and FYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SYLDFYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.36%

-44.55%

-0.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.44%

-1.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.62%

-15.15%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.62%

-25.12%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.36%

-44.55%

-0.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-1.54%

+0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.66%

-8.83%

+3.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

1.52%

+1.03%

Volatility

SYLD vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF (SYLD) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) have volatilities of 3.13% and 3.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SYLDFYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

3.00%

+0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.94%

8.78%

+1.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.55%

11.50%

+4.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.62%

16.23%

+4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.96%

18.03%

+4.93%

SYLD vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SYLD and FYLD have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

SYLD vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

SYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than FYLD's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FYLD
Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF
3.65%4.07%5.41%6.06%6.13%4.74%3.94%3.73%5.17%2.85%2.72%3.98%
SYLD
Cambria Shareholder Yield ETF
1.86%2.25%2.04%1.92%2.20%2.37%1.99%2.08%2.52%1.57%1.92%6.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


SYLD and FYLD have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SYLD has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to FYLD (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYLD dropped -45.36% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

On 10-year performance, SYLD leads with 12.98% vs 11.35% for FYLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SYLD has performed better with a 12.98% return vs 11.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SYLD and FYLD have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FYLD has the higher dividend yield at 3.65%, compared with 1.86% for SYLD.

SYLD is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while FYLD is Global Equities.

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.48 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SYLD and FYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer