SYFI vs. SCYB
SYFI (AB Short Duration High Yield ETF) and SCYB (Schwab High Yield Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. SYFI is actively managed, while SCYB is passively managed. Over the past year, SYFI returned 6.81% vs 7.03% for SCYB. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SYFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCYB.
Performance
SYFI vs. SCYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SYFI having a 1.72% return and SCYB slightly higher at 1.76%.
SYFI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCYB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.76%
- 6M
- 1.99%
- 1Y
- 7.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYFI vs. SCYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.72% | 7.19% | 4.97% |
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 1.76% | 8.33% | 5.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYFI and SCYB is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SYFI and SCYB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYFI vs. SCYB — Risk / Return Rank
SYFI
SCYB
SYFI vs. SCYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) and Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYFI | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.37 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.89 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.16 | 12.95 | +3.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYFI | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 1.89 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 1.70 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
SYFI vs. SCYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum SCYB drawdown of -4.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYFI and SCYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYFI | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -4.92% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -2.44% | +0.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.12% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -0.52% | +0.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 0.54% | -0.12% |
Volatility
SYFI vs. SCYB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) is 0.84%, while Schwab High Yield Bond ETF (SCYB) has a volatility of 1.09%. This indicates that SYFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCYB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYFI | SCYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 1.09% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 2.94% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 3.75% | -0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 5.13% | -0.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 5.13% | -0.90% |
SYFI vs. SCYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCYB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYFI vs. SCYB - Dividend Comparison
SYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, less than SCYB's 6.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SCYB Schwab High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 6.99% | 7.06% | 3.36% |
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.12% | 6.20% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYFI and SCYB have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCYB has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to SYFI (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYFI dropped -4.49% vs SCYB's -4.92%.
On 1-year performance, SCYB leads with 7.03% vs 6.81% for SYFI. On fees, SCYB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SYFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SCYB has performed better with a 7.03% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCYB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SYFI.
SCYB has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 6.12% for SYFI.
They also come from different issuers: AllianceBernstein and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SYFI and 0.03% for SCYB.
SYFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYFI and SCYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer