SYFI vs. FWD
SYFI (AB Short Duration High Yield ETF) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SYFI is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein, while FWD is a Global Equities fund actively managed by AllianceBernstein. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SYFI returned 6.81% vs 72.96% for FWD. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SYFI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.
Performance
SYFI vs. FWD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SYFI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 38.47% return.
SYFI
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- 6.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FWD
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 10.81%
- YTD
- 38.47%
- 6M
- 37.27%
- 1Y
- 72.96%
- 3Y*
- 38.93%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SYFI vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.72% | 7.19% | 4.97% |
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 38.47% | 32.00% | 6.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SYFI and FWD is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2024 | 0.63 |
The correlation between SYFI and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SYFI vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank
SYFI
FWD
SYFI vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SYFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.49 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 5.63 | -2.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.16 | 20.01 | -3.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SYFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.14 | 3.03 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.68 | 1.65 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
SYFI vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SYFI drawdown since its inception was -4.49%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SYFI and FWD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SYFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -29.02% | +24.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.94% | -13.03% | +11.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -1.44% | +1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.35% | -4.06% | +3.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.42% | 3.66% | -3.24% |
Volatility
SYFI vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Short Duration High Yield ETF (SYFI) is 0.84%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 7.87%. This indicates that SYFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SYFI | FWD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.84% | 7.87% | -7.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.42% | 19.00% | -16.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19% | 24.18% | -20.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 24.72% | -20.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.23% | 24.72% | -20.49% |
SYFI vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SYFI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
SYFI vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison
SYFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.12%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FWD AB Disruptors ETF | 0.08% | 0.11% | 1.89% |
SYFI AB Short Duration High Yield ETF | 6.12% | 6.20% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SYFI and FWD have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FWD has higher volatility (7.87%) compared to SYFI (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SYFI dropped -4.49% vs FWD's -29.02%.
On 1-year performance, FWD leads with 72.96% vs 6.81% for SYFI. On fees, SYFI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SYFI has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FWD has performed better with a 72.96% return vs 6.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SYFI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.
SYFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.12%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.
SYFI is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FWD is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SYFI and 0.65% for FWD.
FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SYFI and FWD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer