SENEB vs. SENEA
SENEB (Seneca Foods Corporation) and SENEA (Seneca Foods Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Packaged Foods industry within the Consumer Defensive sector. Over the past 10 years, SENEB returned 15.60%/yr vs 16.17%/yr for SENEA. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SENEB vs. SENEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SENEB achieves a 33.03% return, which is significantly higher than SENEA's 28.02% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SENEB having a 15.60% annualized return and SENEA not far ahead at 16.17%.
SENEB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 5.96%
- YTD
- 33.03%
- 6M
- 20.95%
- 1Y
- 57.74%
- 3Y*
- 47.12%
- 5Y*
- 25.40%
- 10Y*
- 15.60%
SENEA
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -0.11%
- YTD
- 28.02%
- 6M
- 19.76%
- 1Y
- 51.04%
- 3Y*
- 43.67%
- 5Y*
- 23.95%
- 10Y*
- 16.17%
SENEB vs. SENEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SENEB Seneca Foods Corporation | 33.03% | 37.97% | 53.72% | -14.65% | 28.51% | 19.24% | -3.66% | 39.12% | -13.32% | -19.05% |
SENEA Seneca Foods Corporation | 28.02% | 39.58% | 51.14% | -13.96% | 27.11% | 20.18% | -2.18% | 44.54% | -8.23% | -23.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SENEB and SENEA is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1998 | 0.22 |
Fundamentals
SENEB:
$1.01B
SENEA:
$977.81M
SENEB:
$12.99
SENEA:
$12.99
SENEB:
11.22
SENEA:
10.90
SENEB:
0.10
SENEA:
0.10
SENEB:
0.63
SENEA:
0.61
SENEB:
1.41
SENEA:
1.37
SENEB:
$1.61B
SENEA:
$1.61B
SENEB:
$202.67M
SENEA:
$202.67M
SENEB:
$170.76M
SENEA:
$170.76M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SENEB vs. SENEA — Risk / Return Rank
SENEB
SENEA
SENEB vs. SENEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) and Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SENEB | SENEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.80 | 1.51 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 1.90 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | 1.27 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.86 | 2.44 | +0.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.96 | 5.96 | +2.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SENEB | SENEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.80 | 1.51 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.68 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.40 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.12 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
SENEB vs. SENEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SENEB drawdown since its inception was -53.42%, smaller than the maximum SENEA drawdown of -79.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SENEB and SENEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SENEB | SENEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.42% | -79.33% | +25.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -21.04% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.89% | -34.03% | +1.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.42% | -51.29% | -2.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.42% | -51.29% | -2.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.66% | -15.35% | +3.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.04% | -40.96% | +18.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.29% | 8.59% | -1.30% |
Volatility
SENEB vs. SENEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEB) is 2.76%, while Seneca Foods Corporation (SENEA) has a volatility of 9.05%. This indicates that SENEB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SENEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SENEB | SENEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.76% | 9.05% | -6.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.55% | 26.96% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.30% | 34.16% | -1.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.02% | 35.41% | +0.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.95% | 40.56% | -0.61% |
Dividends
SENEB vs. SENEA - Dividend Comparison
Neither SENEB nor SENEA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
SENEB vs. SENEA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seneca Foods Corporation and Seneca Foods Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SENEB vs. SENEA - Profitability Comparison
SENEB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
SENEA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.46M and revenue of 508.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.4%.
SENEB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
SENEA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported an operating income of 59.97M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.8%.
SENEB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
SENEA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seneca Foods Corporation reported a net income of 44.77M and revenue of 508.35M, resulting in a net margin of 8.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SENEB and SENEA have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SENEA has higher volatility (9.05%) compared to SENEB (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SENEB dropped -53.42% vs SENEA's -79.33%.
SENEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SENEB and SENEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer