SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L
SXRW.DE (iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) and SEML.L (iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SXRW.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE 100, while SEML.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXRW.DE returned 8.45%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for SEML.L. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXRW.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SEML.L.
Performance
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXRW.DE is traded in EUR, while SEML.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SEML.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXRW.DE achieves a 11.21% return, which is significantly higher than SEML.L's 3.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRW.DE has outperformed SEML.L with an annualized return of 8.45%, while SEML.L has yielded a comparatively lower 1.67% annualized return.
SXRW.DE
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 4.10%
- 6M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 11.21%
- 1Y
- 24.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.74%
- 10Y*
- 8.45%
SEML.L
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 2.04%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- 8.71%
- 3Y*
- 4.90%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.67%
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 11.21% | 20.63% | 13.57% | 10.46% | -1.47% | 24.81% | -15.42% | 25.18% | -10.61% | 8.11% |
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 3.52% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 7.65% | -5.38% | -3.59% | -6.90% | 15.09% | -1.20% | 0.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRW.DE and SEML.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011 | 0.37 |
The correlation between SXRW.DE and SEML.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (5 years) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXRW.DE
SEML.L
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SXRW.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.27 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 2.14 | +0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.09 | 7.19 | +3.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, roughly equal to the maximum SEML.L drawdown of -41.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRW.DE and SEML.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXRW.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.31% | -41.37% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.91% | -3.92% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.86% | -7.68% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.86% | -10.13% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.31% | -19.93% | -20.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | -9.31% | +9.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -23.66% | +17.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.16% | 1.17% | +0.99% |
Volatility
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF (SEML.L) at 1.26%. This indicates that SXRW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEML.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXRW.DE | SEML.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 1.26% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.38% | 4.55% | +5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.34% | 5.62% | +6.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.06% | 7.17% | +6.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.31% | 8.64% | +7.67% |
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRW.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than SEML.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXRW.DE vs. SEML.L - Dividend Comparison
SXRW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEML.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SEML.L iShares J.P. Morgan EM Local Government Bond UCITS ETF | 5.65% | 5.44% | 5.55% | 5.05% | 5.25% | 4.58% | 5.13% | 5.44% | 7.30% | 6.75% | 6.78% | 5.18% |
SXRW.DE iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXRW.DE and SEML.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXRW.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SEML.L.
SXRW.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while SEML.L is Emerging Markets Bonds. SXRW.DE tracks FTSE 100, while SEML.L tracks JPM GBI-EM Global Diversified TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXRW.DE and 0.50% for SEML.L.
Find the right allocation for SXRW.DE and SEML.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer