PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXRW.DE is traded in EUR, while ESIH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRW.DE achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than ESIH.L's 0.10% return.


SXRW.DE

1D
1.62%
1M
1.39%
YTD
8.05%
6M
11.78%
1Y
20.42%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
8.92%

ESIH.L

1D
0.74%
1M
2.34%
YTD
0.10%
6M
1.71%
1Y
6.65%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
5.21%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
SXRW.DE
iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)
8.05%20.63%13.57%10.46%-1.47%24.81%2.19%
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
0.10%6.89%4.25%7.70%-3.68%24.70%-10.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRW.DE and ESIH.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2020

0.49

The correlation between SXRW.DE and ESIH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRW.DE
SXRW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
SXRW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRW.DEESIH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.07

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

0.42

+2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.30

0.95

+8.35

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRW.DE and ESIH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRW.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.31%, which is greater than ESIH.L's maximum drawdown of -25.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRW.DE and ESIH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRW.DEESIH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.31%

-25.57%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.91%

-12.83%

+4.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

-25.57%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.86%

-25.57%

+8.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-9.32%

+7.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-8.20%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.16%

5.51%

-3.35%

Volatility

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core FTSE 100 UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (SXRW.DE) is 4.45%, while iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that SXRW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESIH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRW.DEESIH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.06%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

11.96%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

16.91%

-4.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

17.75%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

18.00%

-1.10%

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRW.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than ESIH.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXRW.DE nor ESIH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRW.DE and ESIH.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRW.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRW.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for ESIH.L.

SXRW.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while ESIH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. SXRW.DE tracks FTSE 100, while ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SXRW.DE and 0.18% for ESIH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRW.DE and ESIH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer