PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (SXRR.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXRR.DE achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than IS3N.DE's 26.15% return.


SXRR.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.24%
6M
1.42%
YTD
1.42%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
3.76%
5Y*
2.44%
10Y*

IS3N.DE

1D
2.11%
1M
-1.18%
6M
22.85%
YTD
26.15%
1Y
42.71%
3Y*
19.59%
5Y*
8.39%
10Y*
9.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXRR.DE
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
1.42%2.69%4.90%4.43%-0.72%-0.50%-0.32%1.07%-1.64%0.16%
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
26.15%17.14%13.88%7.20%-13.85%7.09%7.07%20.99%-11.06%7.27%

Correlation

The correlation between SXRR.DE and IS3N.DE is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2017

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXRR.DE
SXRR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
SXRR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXRR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXRR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
SXRR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXRR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IS3N.DE
IS3N.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3N.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (SXRR.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SXRR.DEIS3N.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.93

1.40

+0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.00

4.04

+7.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

38.03

13.47

+24.56

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXRR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the IS3N.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXRR.DE and IS3N.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXRR.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.20%, smaller than the maximum IS3N.DE drawdown of -35.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRR.DE and IS3N.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXRR.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.20%

-35.06%

+20.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.24%

-10.52%

+10.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.36%

-19.18%

+17.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-2.72%

-21.99%

+19.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.56%

+4.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-9.24%

+8.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.07%

3.16%

-3.09%

Volatility

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist) (SXRR.DE) is 0.24%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IS3N.DE) has a volatility of 8.89%. This indicates that SXRR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IS3N.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXRR.DEIS3N.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

8.89%

-8.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.10%

16.69%

-15.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42%

19.07%

-17.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.94%

16.62%

-14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.81%

18.15%

-14.34%

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXRR.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IS3N.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXRR.DE vs. IS3N.DE - Dividend Comparison

SXRR.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while IS3N.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3N.DE
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets IMI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SXRR.DE
iShares $ Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Dist)
4.72%5.04%6.01%5.52%1.49%0.58%1.60%3.00%2.06%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXRR.DE and IS3N.DE have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXRR.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXRR.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

SXRR.DE is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IS3N.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. SXRR.DE tracks Bloomberg US Floating Rate Notes 1-5 Year Index (EUR Hedged), while IS3N.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (IMI). Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SXRR.DE and 0.18% for IS3N.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXRR.DE and IS3N.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer