SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE
SXRJ.DE (iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc)) and AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) are both Europe Equities funds - SXRJ.DE tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap while AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXRJ.DE returned 9.05%/yr vs 9.75%/yr for AMED.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SXRJ.DE charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for AMED.DE.
Performance
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXRJ.DE achieves a 10.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMED.DE's 16.87% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRJ.DE has underperformed AMED.DE with an annualized return of 9.05%, while AMED.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.75% annualized return.
SXRJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- YTD
- 10.87%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 16.78%
- 3Y*
- 13.45%
- 5Y*
- 6.53%
- 10Y*
- 9.05%
AMED.DE
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 16.87%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 26.18%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.75%
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRJ.DE iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) | 10.87% | 25.22% | -0.19% | 14.41% | -16.60% | 23.00% | 5.26% | 29.83% | -17.96% | 23.99% |
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 16.87% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | 11.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRJ.DE and AMED.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2010 | 0.87 |
The correlation between SXRJ.DE and AMED.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SXRJ.DE
AMED.DE
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRJ.DE) and Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXRJ.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.33 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 2.49 | -0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 9.40 | -3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXRJ.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 1.74 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.65 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.57 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.47 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRJ.DE drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, roughly equal to the maximum AMED.DE drawdown of -38.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRJ.DE and AMED.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXRJ.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -38.35% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.68% | -10.56% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.73% | -14.07% | -1.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.43% | -24.06% | -5.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.38% | -38.35% | -1.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.35% | -0.17% | -1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.44% | -6.69% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.87% | 2.81% | +0.06% |
Volatility
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI EMU Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRJ.DE) is 4.04%, while Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a volatility of 5.61%. This indicates that SXRJ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMED.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXRJ.DE | AMED.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.04% | 5.61% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.42% | 12.64% | -1.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.80% | 15.19% | -1.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.23% | 15.87% | +0.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 17.00% | -0.72% |
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRJ.DE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than AMED.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXRJ.DE vs. AMED.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXRJ.DE nor AMED.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SXRJ.DE and AMED.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for SXRJ.DE.
SXRJ.DE tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap, while AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for SXRJ.DE and 0.25% for AMED.DE.
Find the right allocation for SXRJ.DE and AMED.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer