SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRD.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L).
SXRD.DE and SSLN.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXRD.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI UK Small Cap. It was launched on Jul 1, 2009. SSLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Silver. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. Both SXRD.DE and SSLN.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXRD.DE iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) | -3.15% | 10.75% | 9.62% | 12.01% | -27.04% | 20.49% | -10.12% | 39.79% | -17.72% | 15.74% |
SSLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 2.49% | 118.25% | 29.15% | -4.21% | 9.79% | -5.89% | 33.09% | 19.85% | -4.67% | -9.31% |
Different Trading Currencies
SXRD.DE is traded in EUR, while SSLN.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SSLN.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXRD.DE achieves a -3.15% return, which is significantly lower than SSLN.L's 2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, SXRD.DE has underperformed SSLN.L with an annualized return of 3.52%, while SSLN.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.
SXRD.DE
- 1D
- 2.48%
- 1M
- -7.62%
- YTD
- -3.15%
- 6M
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- 10.66%
- 3Y*
- 8.68%
- 5Y*
- 0.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.52%
SSLN.L
- 1D
- -4.09%
- 1M
- -13.06%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 6M
- 57.80%
- 1Y
- 98.30%
- 3Y*
- 41.11%
- 5Y*
- 24.42%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXRD.DE has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SSLN.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXRD.DE
SSLN.L
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRD.DE) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXRD.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.62 | 1.87 | -1.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 2.21 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.93 | 2.99 | -2.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.27 | 9.18 | -5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXRD.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 | 1.87 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.75 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.18 | 0.57 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.18 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between SXRD.DE and SSLN.L is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXRD.DE nor SSLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXRD.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.59%, smaller than the maximum SSLN.L drawdown of -68.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXRD.DE and SSLN.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXRD.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.59% | -69.95% | +22.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.19% | -38.72% | +26.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.75% | -38.72% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.59% | -38.72% | -8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -34.15% | +25.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.28% | -45.48% | +35.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 12.48% | -9.17% |
Volatility
SXRD.DE vs. SSLN.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI UK Small Cap UCITS ETF (Acc) (SXRD.DE) is 6.07%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (SSLN.L) has a volatility of 17.70%. This indicates that SXRD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SSLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SXRD.DE | SSLN.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 17.70% | -11.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.83% | 50.25% | -40.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.13% | 52.33% | -35.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.22% | 32.62% | -15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.82% | 29.04% | -9.22% |