PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXR5.DE vs. IPAC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR5.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXR5.DE is traded in EUR, while IPAC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IPAC values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXR5.DE achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than IPAC's 15.24% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SXR5.DE having a 9.05% annualized return and IPAC not far behind at 8.79%.


SXR5.DE

1D
-0.36%
1M
6.13%
YTD
16.96%
6M
16.92%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
15.53%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
9.05%

IPAC

1D
0.05%
1M
4.49%
YTD
15.24%
6M
15.09%
1Y
25.77%
3Y*
14.15%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
8.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXR5.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
16.96%12.72%13.72%16.13%-12.71%9.55%4.95%22.00%-9.97%8.96%
IPAC
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
15.24%10.31%13.18%11.08%-8.33%10.80%3.12%22.14%-8.69%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between SXR5.DE and IPAC is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014

0.77

The correlation between SXR5.DE and IPAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXR5.DE
SXR5.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SXR5.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXR5.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXR5.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SXR5.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXR5.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

IPAC
IPAC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IPAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IPAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IPAC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IPAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
IPAC Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR5.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXR5.DEIPACDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.33

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.04

2.76

+0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.81

10.55

-0.74

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXR5.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the IPAC Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXR5.DE and IPAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXR5.DEIPACDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

1.75

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.58

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.55

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.52

-0.04

Drawdowns

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXR5.DE drawdown since its inception was -28.03%, smaller than the maximum IPAC drawdown of -31.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXR5.DE and IPAC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXR5.DEIPACDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.03%

-31.10%

+3.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.14%

-9.38%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-16.53%

-0.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.30%

-16.53%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

-31.10%

+3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

0.00%

-0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.27%

-5.19%

-2.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.15%

2.45%

+0.70%

Volatility

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SXR5.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.67% compared to iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF (IPAC) at 3.05%. This indicates that SXR5.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IPAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXR5.DEIPACDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.67%

3.05%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.22%

11.54%

+3.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.90%

14.81%

+4.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

15.11%

+1.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.41%

16.14%

+0.27%

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXR5.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IPAC's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXR5.DE vs. IPAC - Dividend Comparison

SXR5.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IPAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IPAC
iShares Core MSCI Pacific ETF
3.79%4.32%3.43%3.16%2.76%4.03%1.68%3.37%2.95%2.98%2.66%2.60%
SXR5.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SXR5.DE and IPAC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IPAC is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IPAC is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for SXR5.DE.

SXR5.DE is categorized as Japan Equities, while IPAC is Asia Pacific Equities. SXR5.DE tracks MSCI Japan, while IPAC tracks MSCI Pacific Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SXR5.DE and 0.09% for IPAC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXR5.DE and IPAC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer