PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SXLU.L is traded in USD, while ROBG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ROBG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLU.L achieves a 1.45% return, which is significantly lower than ROBG.L's 27.71% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLU.L has underperformed ROBG.L with an annualized return of 8.49%, while ROBG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.76% annualized return.


SXLU.L

1D
-2.18%
1M
-5.29%
YTD
1.45%
6M
0.93%
1Y
9.93%
3Y*
12.59%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
8.49%

ROBG.L

1D
-1.48%
1M
5.14%
YTD
27.71%
6M
25.48%
1Y
55.98%
3Y*
16.56%
5Y*
7.02%
10Y*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLU.L
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF
1.45%15.70%22.97%-8.14%2.07%18.45%-1.27%25.13%2.96%10.96%
ROBG.L
L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF
27.71%23.33%-1.71%24.60%-33.82%15.99%45.19%30.37%-21.35%46.01%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLU.L and ROBG.L is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2015

0.22

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLU.L
ROBG.L

Utilities

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

-

2.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

4.6%

Industrials

-

45.6%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

45.5%

Utilities

SXLU.L
100.0%
ROBG.L

-

Basic Materials

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Communication Services

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L
2.9%

Consumer Defensive

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Energy

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Financial Services

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Healthcare

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L
4.6%

Industrials

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L
45.6%

Real Estate

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L

-

Technology

SXLU.L

-

ROBG.L
45.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLU.L
SXLU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBG.L
ROBG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLU.LROBG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.42

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.47

-2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.03

13.58

-11.56

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLU.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the ROBG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLU.L and ROBG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLU.LROBG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

2.47

-1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.31

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.63

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.53

0.00

Drawdowns

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, smaller than the maximum ROBG.L drawdown of -43.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and ROBG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLU.LROBG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.20%

-43.06%

+6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-16.08%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.41%

-27.75%

+9.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-43.06%

+16.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.20%

-43.06%

+6.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.93%

-1.86%

-7.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-13.32%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

4.12%

+0.10%

Volatility

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) is 4.96%, while L&G ROBO Global Robotics and Automation UCITS ETF (ROBG.L) has a volatility of 8.18%. This indicates that SXLU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLU.LROBG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

8.18%

-3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.51%

17.51%

-6.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.25%

22.60%

-8.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

22.88%

-5.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.01%

21.77%

-3.76%

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBG.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

SXLU.L vs. ROBG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLU.L nor ROBG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SXLU.L and ROBG.L have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SXLU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ROBG.L.

SXLU.L is categorized as Utilities Equities, while ROBG.L is Robotics. SXLU.L tracks MSCI World/Utilities NR USD, while ROBG.L tracks ROBO Global Robotics and Automation Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLU.L and 0.80% for ROBG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLU.L and ROBG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer