SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS).
SXLU.L and VHYL.AS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXLU.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI World/Utilities NR USD. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. VHYL.AS is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD. It was launched on May 21, 2013. Both SXLU.L and VHYL.AS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXLU.L or VHYL.AS.
Key characteristics
| SXLU.L | VHYL.AS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 26.31% | 17.53% |
| 1Y Return | 35.48% | 24.01% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 8.46% | 8.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.40% | 8.29% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.18 | 2.57 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.94 | 3.36 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.37 | 1.49 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.50 | 3.55 |
| Martin Ratio | 9.32 | 16.88 |
| Ulcer Index | 3.30% | 1.40% |
| Daily Std Dev | 14.55% | 9.24% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.20% | -34.08% |
| Current Drawdown | -4.20% | -0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLU.L and VHYL.AS is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, SXLU.L achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly higher than VHYL.AS's 17.53% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VHYL.AS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Dividend Comparison
SXLU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VHYL.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLU.L SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHYL.AS Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing | 2.69% | 3.15% | 3.60% | 2.59% | 2.68% | 2.89% | 3.14% | 2.76% | 2.73% | 2.92% | 2.61% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLU.L drawdown since its inception was -36.20%, which is greater than VHYL.AS's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLU.L and VHYL.AS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXLU.L vs. VHYL.AS - Volatility Comparison
SPDR S&P US Utilities Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.03% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF - (USD) Distributing (VHYL.AS) at 2.71%. This indicates that SXLU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHYL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.