PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than XDWS.L's 3.47% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has outperformed XDWS.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while XDWS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 5.65% annualized return.


SXLP.L

1D
1.36%
1M
-4.09%
YTD
6.25%
6M
5.40%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
7.27%
5Y*
5.72%
10Y*
7.10%

XDWS.L

1D
0.81%
1M
-3.77%
YTD
3.47%
6M
3.17%
1Y
1.71%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
4.01%
10Y*
5.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLP.L
SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF
6.25%2.99%13.10%-1.70%-0.20%16.85%8.74%26.97%-8.84%12.07%
XDWS.L
Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C
3.47%9.31%5.69%1.96%-5.24%12.84%7.75%22.32%-10.10%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLP.L and XDWS.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2016

0.91

The correlation between SXLP.L and XDWS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SXLP.L
XDWS.L

Consumer Defensive

99.0%
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

0.2%

Healthcare

-

0.2%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Defensive

SXLP.L
99.0%
XDWS.L
97.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SXLP.L
1.0%
XDWS.L
2.2%

Basic Materials

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Communication Services

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Energy

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Financial Services

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L
0.2%

Healthcare

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L
0.2%

Industrials

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Real Estate

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Technology

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Utilities

SXLP.L

-

XDWS.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLP.L
SXLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

XDWS.L
XDWS.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDWS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLP.LXDWS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.03

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

0.18

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.63

0.39

+0.24

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the XDWS.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLP.L and XDWS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLP.LXDWS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

0.14

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.33

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.45

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.47

+0.07

Drawdowns

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, roughly equal to the maximum XDWS.L drawdown of -23.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and XDWS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLP.LXDWS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.00%

-23.72%

-0.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-9.74%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-11.52%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-17.53%

+0.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.00%

-23.72%

-0.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.20%

-8.78%

+0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-4.19%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.40%

4.34%

+0.06%

Volatility

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Xtrackers MSCI World Consumer Staples UCITS ETF 1C (XDWS.L) at 4.75%. This indicates that SXLP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDWS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SXLP.LXDWS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.78%

4.75%

+1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

10.21%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.72%

12.38%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

12.11%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.53%

12.48%

+1.05%

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XDWS.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SXLP.L vs. XDWS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLP.L nor XDWS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, SXLP.L and XDWS.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XDWS.L.

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.25% for XDWS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and XDWS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer