SXLP.L vs. FSTA
Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA).
SXLP.L and FSTA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SXLP.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015. FSTA is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both SXLP.L and FSTA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SXLP.L or FSTA.
Correlation
The correlation between SXLP.L and FSTA is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SXLP.L:
1.52
FSTA:
1.64
SXLP.L:
2.24
FSTA:
2.41
SXLP.L:
1.27
FSTA:
1.28
SXLP.L:
2.02
FSTA:
2.29
SXLP.L:
6.09
FSTA:
6.99
SXLP.L:
2.41%
FSTA:
2.33%
SXLP.L:
9.64%
FSTA:
9.92%
SXLP.L:
-24.00%
FSTA:
-25.13%
SXLP.L:
-0.67%
FSTA:
-1.28%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLP.L having a 4.31% return and FSTA slightly higher at 4.45%.
SXLP.L
4.31%
4.80%
2.82%
14.52%
7.44%
N/A
FSTA
4.45%
4.83%
3.66%
14.90%
8.66%
8.30%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SXLP.L vs. FSTA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SXLP.L
FSTA
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
SXLP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FSTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLP.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.15% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% | 2.24% |
Drawdowns
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, roughly equal to the maximum FSTA drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and FSTA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SXLP.L vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) is 2.68%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that SXLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.