SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SXLP.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and LUXG.L (Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, from State Street and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L returned 7.10%/yr vs 9.74%/yr for LUXG.L. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SXLP.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LUXG.L.

Performance

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SXLP.L is traded in USD, while LUXG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the LUXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLP.L achieves a 6.25% return, which is significantly higher than LUXG.L's -7.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLP.L has underperformed LUXG.L with an annualized return of 7.10%, while LUXG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.74% annualized return.

SXLP.L

• 1D: 1.36%
• 1M: -4.09%
• YTD: 6.25%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 2.81%
• 3Y*: 7.27%
• 5Y*: 5.72%
• 10Y*: 7.10%

LUXG.L

• 1D: -1.31%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: -7.73%
• 6M: -6.57%
• 1Y: 4.91%
• 3Y*: 1.55%
• 5Y*: -0.63%
• 10Y*: 9.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SXLP.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF	6.25%	2.99%	13.10%	-1.70%	-0.20%	16.85%	8.74%	26.97%	-8.84%	12.07%
LUXG.L Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD	-7.73%	15.01%	-1.79%	15.56%	-23.61%	22.72%	35.66%	30.32%	-13.22%	38.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SXLP.L and LUXG.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2016	0.36

The correlation between SXLP.L and LUXG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.36 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SXLP.L	LUXG.L
Consumer Defensive	99.0%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	13.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	13.3%
Energy	-	2.3%
Financial Services	-	4.4%
Healthcare	-	6.2%
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	55.0%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLP.L

SXLP.L Risk / Return Rank: 12
SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
SXLP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
SXLP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 11
SXLP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
SXLP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 12

LUXG.L

LUXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 13
LUXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LUXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LUXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LUXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LUXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SXLP.L	LUXG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.20	0.24	-0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.39	0.51	-0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.06	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	0.29	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.63	0.77	-0.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is comparable to the LUXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLP.L and LUXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SXLP.L	LUXG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.20	0.24	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	-0.03	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.44	+0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.44	+0.11

Drawdowns

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, smaller than the maximum LUXG.L drawdown of -43.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and LUXG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	SXLP.L	LUXG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.00%	-43.38%	+19.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.43%	-16.85%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.93%	-25.37%	+12.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.93%	-37.58%	+20.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.00%	-43.38%	+19.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.20%	-11.85%	+3.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.29%	-10.54%	+6.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.40%	6.33%	-1.93%

Volatility

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) is 5.78%, while Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L) has a volatility of 7.34%. This indicates that SXLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LUXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SXLP.L	LUXG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.78%	7.34%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.24%	16.13%	-4.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.72%	20.27%	-6.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	23.13%	-9.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.53%	22.27%	-8.74%

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLP.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than LUXG.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SXLP.L vs. LUXG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLP.L nor LUXG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SXLP.L and LUXG.L in my portfolio?

SXLP.L and LUXG.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SXLP.L or LUXG.L?

On fees, SXLP.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SXLP.L or LUXG.L?

SXLP.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LUXG.L.

What is the main difference between SXLP.L and LUXG.L?

Both ETFs track Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLP.L and 0.25% for LUXG.L.