PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LUXG.L vs. VOO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LUXG.LVOO
YTD Return-7.74%26.94%
1Y Return-2.20%35.06%
3Y Return (Ann)-5.64%10.23%
5Y Return (Ann)7.88%15.77%
Sharpe Ratio-0.243.08
Sortino Ratio-0.244.09
Omega Ratio0.971.58
Calmar Ratio-0.174.46
Martin Ratio-0.4020.36
Ulcer Index9.52%1.85%
Daily Std Dev16.16%12.23%
Max Drawdown-36.58%-33.99%
Current Drawdown-17.84%-0.25%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between LUXG.L and VOO is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LUXG.L achieves a -7.74% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 26.94% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.71%
13.51%
LUXG.L
VOO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LUXG.L vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LUXG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


LUXG.L
Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD
Expense ratio chart for LUXG.L: current value at 0.25% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.25%
Expense ratio chart for VOO: current value at 0.03% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.03%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUXG.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LUXG.L, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.07
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LUXG.L, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.03
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LUXG.L, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LUXG.L, currently valued at -0.05, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LUXG.L, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.00-0.13
VOO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for VOO, currently valued at 2.79, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.79
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.73, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.73
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for VOO, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for VOO, currently valued at 3.99, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.99
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for VOO, currently valued at 18.23, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0018.23

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUXG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.24, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 3.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUXG.L and VOO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.004.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.07
2.79
LUXG.L
VOO

Dividends

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LUXG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LUXG.L
Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.23%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%1.85%1.84%

Drawdowns

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUXG.L drawdown since its inception was -36.58%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUXG.L and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-22.07%
-0.25%
LUXG.L
VOO

Volatility

LUXG.L vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF S&P Global Luxury UCITS ETF USD (LUXG.L) has a higher volatility of 5.76% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.78%. This indicates that LUXG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.76%
3.78%
LUXG.L
VOO