SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L
SXLP.L (SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF) and ICSU.L (iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - SXLP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while ICSU.L tracks the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SXLP.L returned 5.72%/yr vs 6.77%/yr for ICSU.L. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.15% expense ratio.
Performance
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SXLP.L is traded in USD, while ICSU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ICSU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SXLP.L having a 6.25% return and ICSU.L slightly higher at 6.31%.
SXLP.L
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- -4.09%
- YTD
- 6.25%
- 6M
- 5.40%
- 1Y
- 2.81%
- 3Y*
- 7.27%
- 5Y*
- 5.72%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
ICSU.L
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -3.65%
- YTD
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 5.25%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLP.L SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF | 6.25% | 2.99% | 13.10% | -1.70% | -0.20% | 16.85% | 8.74% | 26.97% | -8.84% | 5.78% |
ICSU.L iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 6.31% | 4.10% | 14.32% | -0.86% | -0.17% | 18.55% | 8.88% | 27.70% | -9.40% | 5.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLP.L and ICSU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017 | 0.91 |
The correlation between SXLP.L and ICSU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLP.L
ICSU.L
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLP.L
ICSU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SXLP.L
ICSU.L
Basic Materials
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Communication Services
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Energy
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Financial Services
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Healthcare
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Industrials
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Real Estate
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Technology
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Utilities
SXLP.L
-
ICSU.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLP.L
ICSU.L
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) and iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLP.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.04 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.30 | 0.29 | +0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.63 | 0.61 | +0.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLP.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | 0.19 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 0.50 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.54 | 0.00 |
Drawdowns
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLP.L drawdown since its inception was -24.00%, roughly equal to the maximum ICSU.L drawdown of -23.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLP.L and ICSU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLP.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.00% | -23.39% | -0.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -9.46% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.93% | -12.39% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -16.99% | +0.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.20% | -8.19% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.47% | +0.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.40% | 4.43% | -0.03% |
Volatility
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for SPDR S&P US Consumer Staples Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLP.L) is 5.78%, while iShares S&P 500 Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ICSU.L) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that SXLP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICSU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLP.L | ICSU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 6.19% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.24% | 11.70% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.72% | 14.13% | -0.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 13.62% | -0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.53% | 14.13% | -0.60% |
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SXLP.L and ICSU.L have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SXLP.L vs. ICSU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SXLP.L nor ICSU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SXLP.L and ICSU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLP.L and ICSU.L have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.
SXLP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while ICSU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares.
Find the right allocation for SXLP.L and ICSU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer