PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SXLI.L
SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF
5.86%19.21%17.42%17.94%-5.33%20.69%10.13%28.61%-14.01%23.49%
XLBP.L
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF
10.41%11.28%-0.91%11.69%-12.18%27.63%19.54%24.50%-15.06%22.85%
Different Trading Currencies

SXLI.L is traded in USD, while XLBP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLBP.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SXLI.L achieves a 5.86% return, which is significantly lower than XLBP.L's 10.41% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLI.L has outperformed XLBP.L with an annualized return of 13.19%, while XLBP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.42% annualized return.


SXLI.L

1D
3.51%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
5.86%
6M
7.66%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
12.28%
10Y*
13.19%

XLBP.L

1D
1.99%
1M
-4.98%
YTD
10.41%
6M
13.41%
1Y
19.46%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SXLI.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than XLBP.L's 0.14% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SXLI.L
SXLI.L Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SXLI.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SXLI.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

XLBP.L
XLBP.L Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLBP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SXLI.LXLBP.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.05

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

1.47

+0.66

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.20

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.60

+0.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.93

4.99

+4.95

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SXLI.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the XLBP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SXLI.L and XLBP.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SXLI.LXLBP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.05

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.36

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.54

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.41

+0.25

Correlation

The correlation between SXLI.L and XLBP.L is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SXLI.L nor XLBP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SXLI.L drawdown since its inception was -42.17%, which is greater than XLBP.L's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLI.L and XLBP.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SXLI.LXLBP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.17%

-28.58%

-13.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.14%

-12.34%

-0.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.24%

-21.98%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.17%

-28.58%

-13.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.80%

-4.26%

-2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.76%

-5.55%

+0.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.92%

-0.32%

Volatility

SXLI.L vs. XLBP.L - Volatility Comparison

SPDR S&P US Industrials Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLI.L) and Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) have volatilities of 6.36% and 6.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SXLI.LXLBP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.36%

6.31%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.92%

12.07%

-2.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.56%

18.53%

-0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.11%

18.60%

-1.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.97%

19.45%

-0.48%