SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L
SXLE.L (State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF) and MLPD.L (Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - SXLE.L tracks the S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index while MLPD.L tracks the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SXLE.L returned 9.89%/yr vs 7.30%/yr for MLPD.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SXLE.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for MLPD.L.
Performance
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SXLE.L achieves a 30.88% return, which is significantly higher than MLPD.L's 19.38% return. Over the past 10 years, SXLE.L has outperformed MLPD.L with an annualized return of 9.89%, while MLPD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.30% annualized return.
SXLE.L
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 30.88%
- 6M
- 30.35%
- 1Y
- 44.50%
- 3Y*
- 17.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.28%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
MLPD.L
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 0.78%
- YTD
- 19.38%
- 6M
- 16.54%
- 1Y
- 16.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.18%
- 5Y*
- 17.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.30%
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 30.88% | 9.74% | 3.75% | 0.62% | 62.75% | 50.77% | -31.89% | 9.19% | -18.13% | -1.18% |
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 19.38% | 2.33% | 22.53% | 19.70% | 31.84% | 36.86% | -31.37% | 7.22% | -14.92% | -8.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between SXLE.L and MLPD.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2015 | 0.73 |
The correlation between SXLE.L and MLPD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SXLE.L
MLPD.L
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Energy
SXLE.L
MLPD.L
Basic Materials
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Communication Services
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Consumer Cyclical
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Consumer Defensive
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Financial Services
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Healthcare
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Industrials
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
Real Estate
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Technology
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
-
Utilities
SXLE.L
-
MLPD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L — Risk / Return Rank
SXLE.L
MLPD.L
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) and Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SXLE.L | MLPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 1.93 | +1.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.59 | 4.95 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SXLE.L | MLPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.15 | +0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.85 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 | 0.26 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.15 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SXLE.L drawdown since its inception was -66.60%, smaller than the maximum MLPD.L drawdown of -82.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SXLE.L and MLPD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SXLE.L | MLPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.60% | -82.22% | +15.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.55% | -8.49% | -6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.90% | -17.23% | -3.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.87% | -21.78% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.60% | -75.74% | +9.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.18% | -2.71% | -4.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -28.24% | +14.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 3.31% | +1.32% |
Volatility
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Volatility Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF (SXLE.L) has a higher volatility of 8.19% compared to Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) (MLPD.L) at 5.23%. This indicates that SXLE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SXLE.L | MLPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.19% | 5.23% | +2.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.52% | 10.96% | +7.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 14.23% | +7.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.65% | 20.38% | +6.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 28.35% | +0.31% |
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SXLE.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MLPD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SXLE.L vs. MLPD.L - Dividend Comparison
SXLE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MLPD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLPD.L Invesco Morningstar US Energy Infrastructure MLP UCITS ETF (Dist) | 7.53% | 8.21% | 8.18% | 8.60% | 7.98% | 8.57% | 11.03% | 10.06% | 9.87% | 8.15% | 8.14% | 9.96% |
SXLE.L State Street SPDR S&P U.S. Energy Select Sector UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SXLE.L and MLPD.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SXLE.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SXLE.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for MLPD.L.
SXLE.L tracks S&P Energy Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while MLPD.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SXLE.L and 0.50% for MLPD.L.
Find the right allocation for SXLE.L and MLPD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer