SX5S.L vs. MMS.L
SX5S.L (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - SX5S.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. SX5S.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SX5S.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
SX5S.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.46% | 27.68% | 0.40% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Industrials
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Technology
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Consumer Cyclical
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Consumer Defensive
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Healthcare
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Energy
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Utilities
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Basic Materials
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Communication Services
SX5S.L
MMS.L
Real Estate
SX5S.L
-
MMS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
SX5S.L
MMS.L
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SX5S.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SX5S.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SX5S.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.54% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | — | — |
Volatility
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SX5S.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | — | — |
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SX5S.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SX5S.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SX5S.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
SX5S.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SX5S.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for SX5S.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer