SX5S.L vs. CMU.L
SX5S.L (Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF) and CMU.L (Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select) are both Europe Equities funds tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, from Invesco and Amundi respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SX5S.L returned 11.41%/yr vs 10.79%/yr for CMU.L. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SX5S.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for CMU.L.
Performance
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SX5S.L achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than CMU.L's 15.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SX5S.L has outperformed CMU.L with an annualized return of 11.41%, while CMU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 10.79% annualized return.
SX5S.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 15.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.41%
CMU.L
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 8.13%
- YTD
- 15.89%
- 6M
- 17.12%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.11%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 10.79%
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SX5S.L Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF | 6.46% | 27.68% | 6.13% | 19.91% | -3.67% | 14.48% | 2.12% | 23.51% | -10.62% | 14.35% |
CMU.L Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select | 15.89% | 25.71% | 1.42% | 14.39% | -5.30% | 13.03% | 4.59% | 19.05% | -11.56% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between SX5S.L and CMU.L is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 8, 2014 | 0.80 |
The correlation between SX5S.L and CMU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (all time) to 0.93 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Industrials
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Technology
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Consumer Cyclical
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Consumer Defensive
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Healthcare
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Energy
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Utilities
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Basic Materials
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Communication Services
SX5S.L
CMU.L
Real Estate
SX5S.L
-
CMU.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SX5S.L
CMU.L
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) and Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SX5S.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 2.58 | -0.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.40 | 9.67 | -4.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SX5S.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.98 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.66 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.49 | +0.10 |
Drawdowns
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SX5S.L drawdown since its inception was -32.54%, roughly equal to the maximum CMU.L drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SX5S.L and CMU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SX5S.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.54% | -32.53% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.43% | -11.43% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.85% | -11.95% | -1.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.71% | -21.11% | -0.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.54% | -31.41% | -1.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.57% | -0.18% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -5.80% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 3.05% | +0.39% |
Volatility
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (SX5S.L) is 4.90%, while Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that SX5S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SX5S.L | CMU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.90% | 5.34% | -0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.23% | 12.44% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 14.86% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 16.00% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.88% | 16.78% | +3.10% |
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SX5S.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than CMU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SX5S.L vs. CMU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SX5S.L nor CMU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, SX5S.L and CMU.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SX5S.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SX5S.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for CMU.L.
Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SX5S.L and 0.15% for CMU.L.
Find the right allocation for SX5S.L and CMU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer