SWZ vs. POGSX
SWZ (Total Return Securities Fund) and POGSX (Pin Oak Equity) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, SWZ returned 11.67%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for POGSX. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. SWZ charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for POGSX.
Performance
SWZ vs. POGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWZ achieves a -5.14% return, which is significantly lower than POGSX's 18.29% return. Over the past 10 years, SWZ has underperformed POGSX with an annualized return of 11.67%, while POGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.81% annualized return.
SWZ
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 1Y
- -1.67%
- 3Y*
- 19.90%
- 5Y*
- 11.63%
- 10Y*
- 11.67%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.33%
POGSX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- YTD
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- 33.40%
- 3Y*
- 24.85%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
| $177.26K | $207.26K | $377.27K |
SWZ vs. POGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | -5.14% | 86.85% | -2.46% | 15.50% | -17.69% | 18.20% | 14.19% | 24.00% | -13.18% | 26.28% |
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 18.29% | 27.41% | 18.99% | 27.16% | -25.10% | 21.42% | 10.60% | 27.72% | -6.15% | 15.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWZ and POGSX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1993 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWZ vs. POGSX — Risk / Return Rank
SWZ
POGSX
SWZ vs. POGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) and Pin Oak Equity (POGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWZ | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.43 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 3.95 | -4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 13.95 | -15.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWZ vs. POGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWZ drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, smaller than the maximum POGSX drawdown of -89.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWZ and POGSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWZ | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -89.46% | +19.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.13% | -8.03% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.47% | -15.76% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.36% | -29.81% | -0.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | -33.05% | +1.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.10% | -1.87% | -6.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -36.55% | +14.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.27% | +1.76% |
Volatility
SWZ vs. POGSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) is 1.78%, while Pin Oak Equity (POGSX) has a volatility of 2.40%. This indicates that SWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWZ | POGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.78% | 2.40% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.56% | 12.73% | -6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 15.46% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.21% | 17.77% | +9.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 18.42% | +4.28% |
SWZ vs. POGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWZ has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than POGSX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWZ vs. POGSX - Dividend Comparison
SWZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while POGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.07%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
POGSX Pin Oak Equity | 16.07% | 8.85% | 17.87% | 8.21% | 0.15% | 10.93% | 4.60% | 3.22% | 2.94% | 1.79% | 2.03% | 3.83% |
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | 0.00% | 98.81% | 7.11% | 6.07% | 8.23% | 5.83% | 6.25% | 1.67% | 74.09% | 1.02% | 5.00% | 6.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWZ and POGSX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
POGSX has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to SWZ (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWZ dropped -69.62% vs POGSX's -89.46%.
POGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWZ and POGSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer