SWZ vs. FULVX
SWZ (Total Return Securities Fund) and FULVX (Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SWZ returned 12.68%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for FULVX. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SWZ charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FULVX.
Performance
SWZ vs. FULVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWZ achieves a -4.66% return, which is significantly lower than FULVX's -0.01% return.
SWZ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -1.50%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- -1.98%
- 1Y
- -5.72%
- 3Y*
- 22.10%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 12.00%
FULVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.52%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.55%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- —
SWZ vs. FULVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | -4.66% | 86.85% | -2.46% | 15.50% | -17.69% | 18.20% | 14.19% | 4.59% |
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund | -0.01% | 5.23% | 17.76% | 6.38% | -10.43% | 17.79% | 3.83% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWZ and FULVX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2019 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWZ vs. FULVX — Risk / Return Rank
SWZ
FULVX
SWZ vs. FULVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) and Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWZ | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.74 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.01 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.00 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 0.00 | -1.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWZ | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.55 | 0.00 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 0.43 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.40 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
SWZ vs. FULVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWZ drawdown since its inception was -69.62%, which is greater than FULVX's maximum drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWZ and FULVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWZ | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.62% | -33.24% | -36.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.16% | -6.33% | -1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.52% | -10.31% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.36% | -18.64% | -11.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.63% | -3.95% | -3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.97% | -5.09% | -16.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.75% | 2.16% | +2.59% |
Volatility
SWZ vs. FULVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Total Return Securities Fund (SWZ) is 1.70%, while Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) has a volatility of 1.84%. This indicates that SWZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FULVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWZ | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 1.84% | -0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 5.81% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.40% | 8.38% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.27% | 12.19% | +15.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.84% | 16.22% | +6.62% |
SWZ vs. FULVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWZ has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than FULVX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
SWZ vs. FULVX - Dividend Comparison
SWZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FULVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.25%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund | 13.25% | 6.82% | 5.76% | 1.65% | 4.98% | 5.35% | 0.62% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWZ Total Return Securities Fund | 0.00% | 98.81% | 7.11% | 6.07% | 8.23% | 5.83% | 6.25% | 1.67% | 74.09% | 1.02% | 5.00% | 6.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWZ and FULVX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FULVX has higher volatility (1.84%) compared to SWZ (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWZ dropped -69.62% vs FULVX's -33.24%.
FULVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.00 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWZ and FULVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer