PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYMX vs. WAESX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYMX achieves a 11.75% return, which is significantly higher than WAESX's 7.03% return.


SWYMX

1D
0.21%
1M
4.06%
YTD
11.75%
6M
12.78%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*

WAESX

1D
0.15%
1M
0.62%
YTD
7.03%
6M
7.08%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
-0.87%
10Y*
8.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
11.75%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
7.03%10.56%-0.12%17.52%-37.38%21.34%48.36%28.05%-11.50%37.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYMX and WAESX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.68

The correlation between SWYMX and WAESX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYMX vs. WAESX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

WAESX
WAESX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
WAESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WAESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
WAESX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
WAESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
WAESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SWYMXWAESXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.48

0.74

+1.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

1.17

+2.26

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.14

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

1.08

+2.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.41

3.57

+10.85

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is higher than the WAESX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYMX and WAESX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SWYMXWAESXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

0.74

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

-0.04

+0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.27

+0.47

Drawdowns

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum WAESX drawdown of -45.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and WAESX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYMXWAESXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-45.85%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-11.18%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.95%

-21.75%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-45.85%

+20.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-18.46%

+18.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.51%

-16.61%

+12.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

3.38%

-1.47%

Volatility

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) is 3.38%, while Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund (WAESX) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that SWYMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WAESX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYMXWAESXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.38%

5.42%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

14.15%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

17.09%

-5.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.72%

20.06%

-5.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.63%

19.73%

-4.10%

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYMX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than WAESX's 1.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

SWYMX vs. WAESX - Dividend Comparison

SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, while WAESX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.79%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%
WAESX
Wasatch Emerging Markets Select Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWYMX and WAESX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WAESX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to SWYMX (3.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYMX dropped -30.48% vs WAESX's -45.85%.

SWYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYMX and WAESX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer