SWYMX vs. MLLIX
SWYMX (Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund) and MLLIX (MFS Lifetime Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, SWYMX returned 9.40%/yr vs 3.05%/yr for MLLIX. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. SWYMX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for MLLIX.
Performance
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYMX achieves a 10.70% return, which is significantly higher than MLLIX's 3.48% return.
SWYMX
- 1D
- 1.69%
- 1M
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 10.70%
- 1Y
- 21.61%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 9.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.30%
MLLIX
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 1Y
- 7.47%
- 3Y*
- 7.16%
- 5Y*
- 3.05%
- 10Y*
- 4.87%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | 10.70% | 19.42% | 14.24% | 20.92% | -17.65% | 17.80% | 14.66% | 25.34% | -7.58% | 20.48% |
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 3.48% | 9.32% | 5.62% | 9.12% | -11.99% | 6.63% | 10.06% | 13.91% | -2.37% | 8.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYMX and MLLIX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016 | 0.82 |
The correlation between SWYMX and MLLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWYMX vs. MLLIX — Risk / Return Rank
SWYMX
MLLIX
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) and MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWYMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.32 | 1.97 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.96 | 8.67 | +1.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYMX drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, which is greater than MLLIX's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYMX and MLLIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.48% | -17.32% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.55% | -3.86% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.95% | -4.93% | -10.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -16.08% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.64% | -0.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.45% | -2.14% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.99% | 0.88% | +1.11% |
Volatility
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Volatility Comparison
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) has a higher volatility of 3.33% compared to MFS Lifetime Income Fund (MLLIX) at 1.06%. This indicates that SWYMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MLLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWYMX | MLLIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 1.06% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.08% | 3.66% | +6.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 4.51% | +7.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 5.95% | +8.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 5.71% | +9.89% |
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYMX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than MLLIX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWYMX vs. MLLIX - Dividend Comparison
SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than MLLIX's 7.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MLLIX MFS Lifetime Income Fund | 7.43% | 6.01% | 6.26% | 3.70% | 3.92% | 6.12% | 3.18% | 3.80% | 4.20% | 3.56% | 4.21% | 2.51% |
SWYMX Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund | 1.81% | 2.00% | 2.03% | 1.99% | 1.96% | 1.78% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 2.15% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SWYMX and MLLIX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SWYMX has higher volatility (3.33%) compared to MLLIX (1.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYMX dropped -30.48% vs MLLIX's -17.32%.
MLLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWYMX and MLLIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer