PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYLX vs. SWYBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2020 Index Fund (SWYLX) and Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYLX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly higher than SWYBX's 4.97% return.


SWYLX

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.76%
YTD
5.34%
6M
5.10%
1Y
13.19%
3Y*
10.79%
5Y*
5.22%
10Y*

SWYBX

1D
-0.14%
1M
0.78%
YTD
4.97%
6M
4.72%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
10.31%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYLX
Schwab Target 2020 Index Fund
5.34%12.23%8.03%13.15%-13.79%8.06%11.04%16.21%-3.08%12.11%
SWYBX
Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund
4.97%11.88%7.59%12.68%-13.59%7.67%10.93%14.99%-2.59%9.85%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYLX and SWYBX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.99

The correlation between SWYLX and SWYBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYLX vs. SWYBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWYLX
SWYLX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYBX
SWYBX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2020 Index Fund (SWYLX) and Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYLXSWYBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.92

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.10

12.99

+0.11

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the SWYBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYLX and SWYBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYLX drawdown since its inception was -20.63%, roughly equal to the maximum SWYBX drawdown of -20.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYLX and SWYBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYLXSWYBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.63%

-20.49%

-0.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.70%

-4.48%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.02%

-6.84%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.63%

-20.49%

-0.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.35%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-3.44%

-0.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

1.01%

+0.04%

Volatility

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2020 Index Fund (SWYLX) has a higher volatility of 2.44% compared to Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX) at 2.23%. This indicates that SWYLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWYBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYLXSWYBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.23%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.19%

4.86%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.30%

5.94%

+0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.50%

8.20%

+0.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.26%

7.84%

+0.42%

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SWYLX and SWYBX have an expense ratio of 0.04%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYLX vs. SWYBX - Dividend Comparison

SWYLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.42%, more than SWYBX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SWYBX
Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund
4.30%4.52%3.67%2.38%2.61%2.74%2.32%2.23%1.77%1.44%0.78%
SWYLX
Schwab Target 2020 Index Fund
5.42%5.70%4.82%2.61%2.48%2.44%1.77%2.12%2.29%1.21%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SWYLX and SWYBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYLX has higher volatility (2.44%) compared to SWYBX (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYLX dropped -20.63% vs SWYBX's -20.49%.

SWYBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYLX and SWYBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer