PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SWYBX vs. VTINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SWYBX vs. VTINX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

SWYBX (Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund) and VTINX (Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund) are both mutual funds - SWYBX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while VTINX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by Vanguard. Over the past 5 years, SWYBX returned 5.05%/yr vs 4.19%/yr for VTINX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWYBX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VTINX.

Performance

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX) and Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYBX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than VTINX's 4.55% return.

SWYBX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.87%
YTD
5.19%
6M
5.61%
1Y
13.89%
3Y*
10.54%
5Y*
5.05%
10Y*
—

VTINX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.69%
YTD
4.55%
6M
5.05%
1Y
12.09%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
4.19%
10Y*
5.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYBX
Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund		5.19%11.88%7.59%12.68%-13.59%7.67%10.93%14.99%-2.59%9.85%
VTINX
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund		4.55%11.31%6.66%10.66%-12.75%5.24%10.02%13.16%-1.98%7.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYBX and VTINX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.94

The correlation between SWYBX and VTINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SWYBX
VTINX

Technology

27.9%
27.4%

Financial Services

14.1%
16.1%

Industrials

10.9%
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

8.9%
9.4%

Real Estate

8.2%
2.5%

Communication Services

8.1%
8.0%

Healthcare

8.0%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.8%

Energy

3.8%
4.3%

Basic Materials

3.1%
4.3%

Utilities

2.4%
2.7%

Technology

SWYBX
27.9%
VTINX
27.4%

Financial Services

SWYBX
14.1%
VTINX
16.1%

Industrials

SWYBX
10.9%
VTINX
12.3%

Consumer Cyclical

SWYBX
8.9%
VTINX
9.4%

Real Estate

SWYBX
8.2%
VTINX
2.5%

Communication Services

SWYBX
8.1%
VTINX
8.0%

Healthcare

SWYBX
8.0%
VTINX
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

SWYBX
4.7%
VTINX
4.8%

Energy

SWYBX
3.8%
VTINX
4.3%

Basic Materials

SWYBX
3.1%
VTINX
4.3%

Utilities

SWYBX
2.4%
VTINX
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund

Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund

Often compared with SWYBX:
SWYBX vs. SWYLXSWYBX vs. FFFDXSWYBX vs. VTSWYBX vs. SWTSXSWYBX vs. FNSHXSWYBX vs. FIRMXSWYBX vs. FFFAX
Often compared with VTINX:
VTINX vs. VWINXVTINX vs. FIKFXVTINX vs. VSCGXVTINX vs. VTWNXVTINX vs. VBTIXVTINX vs. IRTRVTINX vs. SWBRX

Return for Risk

SWYBX vs. VTINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SWYBX
SWYBX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWYBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYBX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYBX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
VTINX
VTINX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VTINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTINX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX) and Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SWYBXVTINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.49

2.51

-0.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.62

3.68

-0.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.50

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.14

2.98

+0.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.21

13.16

+1.05

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYBX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the VTINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYBX and VTINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SWYBXVTINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.51

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.69

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.93

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.93

-0.13

Drawdowns

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYBX drawdown since its inception was -20.49%, roughly equal to the maximum VTINX drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYBX and VTINX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SWYBXVTINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.49%

-19.96%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.48%

-4.14%

-0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.84%

-5.26%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.49%

-17.02%

-3.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-17.02%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-2.20%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

0.94%

+0.05%

Volatility

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund (SWYBX) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund (VTINX) at 1.77%. This indicates that SWYBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SWYBXVTINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.77%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.49%

4.02%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.64%

4.89%

+0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.16%

6.06%

+2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.84%

5.73%

+2.11%

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYBX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VTINX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWYBX vs. VTINX - Dividend Comparison

SWYBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%, less than VTINX's 4.81% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYBX
Schwab Target 2015 Index Fund		4.30%4.52%3.67%2.38%2.61%2.74%2.32%2.23%1.77%1.44%0.78%0.00%
VTINX
Vanguard Target Retirement Income Fund		4.81%5.02%5.89%4.01%3.08%8.63%3.42%2.62%4.19%1.56%2.27%3.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.97, SWYBX and VTINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SWYBX has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to VTINX (1.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYBX dropped -20.49% vs VTINX's -19.96%.

VTINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYBX and VTINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer