SWYHX vs. VT
SWYHX (Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - SWYHX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Charles Schwab, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, SWYHX returned 9.48%/yr vs 10.51%/yr for VT. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. SWYHX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
SWYHX vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWYHX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 10.06% return.
SWYHX
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- 1Y
- 24.10%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
VT
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- 10.06%
- 6M
- 9.32%
- 1Y
- 25.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 10.51%
- 10Y*
- 12.96%
SWYHX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYHX Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund | 10.91% | 18.65% | 13.72% | 20.34% | -17.37% | 17.04% | 14.50% | 24.80% | -7.28% | 20.07% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 10.06% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWYHX and VT is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016 | 0.98 |
The correlation between SWYHX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWYHX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
SWYHX
VT
SWYHX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund (SWYHX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SWYHX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.35 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.67 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 11.57 | +2.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SWYHX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWYHX drawdown since its inception was -29.41%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYHX and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWYHX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.41% | -50.27% | +20.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -9.67% | +1.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.14% | -16.51% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.92% | -26.38% | +1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.24% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -2.80% | +2.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.36% | -7.00% | +2.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.84% | 2.23% | -0.39% |
Volatility
SWYHX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund (SWYHX) is 4.24%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that SWYHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWYHX | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.24% | 5.65% | -1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.17% | 11.32% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.22% | 13.58% | -2.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 16.19% | -2.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 17.20% | -2.17% |
SWYHX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
SWYHX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWYHX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
SWYHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, more than VT's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWYHX Schwab Target 2045 Index Fund | 1.88% | 2.08% | 2.13% | 2.02% | 1.98% | 1.80% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 2.23% | 1.42% | 1.05% | 0.00% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.61% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, SWYHX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VT has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to SWYHX (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYHX dropped -29.41% vs VT's -50.27%.
SWYHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SWYHX and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer