PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SWYGX vs. SFLNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWYGX achieves a 9.09% return, which is significantly lower than SFLNX's 17.37% return.


SWYGX

1D
1.43%
1M
-0.45%
6M
6.60%
YTD
9.09%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.32%

SFLNX

1D
0.51%
1M
1.26%
6M
12.56%
YTD
17.37%
1Y
32.13%
3Y*
18.83%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
14.18%
ALL TIME*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
9.09%17.57%12.83%19.45%-16.94%15.68%14.19%23.63%-6.62%19.12%
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
17.37%17.02%16.78%18.16%-6.89%31.64%9.12%28.91%-7.43%17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWYGX and SFLNX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2016

0.89

The correlation between SWYGX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SWYGX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SWYGX
SWYGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SWYGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLNX
SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SWYGXSFLNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.52

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

4.87

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

19.48

-9.57

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWYGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWYGX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWYGX drawdown since its inception was -27.62%, smaller than the maximum SFLNX drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWYGX and SFLNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SWYGXSFLNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.62%

-56.18%

+28.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.50%

-6.10%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.96%

-16.27%

+3.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.07%

-18.98%

-5.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.50%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.12%

-5.96%

+1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

1.53%

+0.21%

Volatility

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund (SWYGX) has a higher volatility of 2.90% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.33%. This indicates that SWYGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SWYGXSFLNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

2.33%

+0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

7.49%

+1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.62%

10.50%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.28%

15.16%

-1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.00%

18.34%

-4.34%

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWYGX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SWYGX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWYGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, more than SFLNX's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFLNX
Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund
1.43%1.68%1.78%1.86%2.09%4.78%6.17%5.33%9.69%3.28%7.23%5.68%
SWYGX
Schwab Target 2040 Index Fund
2.04%2.23%2.28%2.06%2.03%1.80%1.72%1.95%2.21%1.44%1.13%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SWYGX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SWYGX has higher volatility (2.90%) compared to SFLNX (2.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWYGX dropped -27.62% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SWYGX and SFLNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer