SWSSX vs. SFLNX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

SWSSX (Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares) and SFLNX (Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund) are both mutual funds - SWSSX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index, while SFLNX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell RAFI US Large Company Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SWSSX returned 11.20%/yr vs 14.26%/yr for SFLNX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SWSSX charges 0.04%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SFLNX.

Performance

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SWSSX achieves a 18.71% return, which is significantly higher than SFLNX's 14.66% return. Over the past 10 years, SWSSX has underperformed SFLNX with an annualized return of 11.20%, while SFLNX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.

SWSSX

• 1D: 0.92%
• 1M: 5.00%
• YTD: 18.71%
• 6M: 17.43%
• 1Y: 41.24%
• 3Y*: 18.69%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 11.20%

SFLNX

• 1D: 0.46%
• 1M: 4.08%
• YTD: 14.66%
• 6M: 14.73%
• 1Y: 32.46%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 12.96%
• 10Y*: 14.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares	18.71%	12.88%	11.57%	17.07%	-20.43%	14.77%	20.12%	25.63%	-11.19%	14.76%
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	14.66%	17.02%	16.78%	18.16%	-6.89%	31.64%	9.12%	28.91%	-7.43%	17.08%

Correlation

The correlation between SWSSX and SFLNX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2008	0.88

The correlation between SWSSX and SFLNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SWSSX	SFLNX
Industrials	17.7%	9.4%
Technology	17.0%	19.0%
Healthcare	16.5%	11.9%
Financial Services	15.8%	13.9%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	9.2%
Real Estate	6.1%	1.8%
Energy	6.1%	10.2%
Basic Materials	4.8%	3.7%
Utilities	2.9%	3.2%
Communication Services	2.4%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	7.4%

Return for Risk

SWSSX vs. SFLNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SWSSX

SWSSX Risk / Return Rank: 64
SWSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SWSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
SWSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
SWSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
SWSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SFLNX

SFLNX Risk / Return Rank: 92
SFLNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SFLNX Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SFLNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
SFLNX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) and Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SWSSX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	3.23	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	4.50	-1.37
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.59	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.97	5.47	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.11	21.47	-7.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SWSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the SFLNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SWSSX and SFLNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SWSSX	SFLNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	3.23	-0.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30	0.85	-0.56
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.47	0.78	-0.31
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.53	-0.17

Drawdowns

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SWSSX drawdown since its inception was -60.34%, which is greater than SFLNX's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWSSX and SFLNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	SWSSX	SFLNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.34%	-56.18%	-4.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-6.10%	-4.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.50%	-16.27%	-11.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.93%	-18.98%	-12.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.81%	-37.59%	-4.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.13%	0.00%	-0.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.73%	-6.01%	-4.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	1.55%	+1.54%

Volatility

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares (SWSSX) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund (SFLNX) at 2.48%. This indicates that SWSSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFLNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SWSSX	SFLNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.61%	2.48%	+3.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.60%	7.43%	+6.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.15%	10.35%	+8.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.59%	15.26%	+7.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.09%	18.40%	+5.69%

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SWSSX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLNX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SWSSX vs. SFLNX - Dividend Comparison

SWSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than SFLNX's 1.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SFLNX Schwab Fundamental US Large Company Index Fund	1.46%	1.68%	1.78%	1.86%	2.09%	4.78%	6.17%	5.33%	9.69%	3.28%	7.23%	5.68%
SWSSX Schwab Small-Cap Index Fund-Select Shares	1.08%	1.29%	1.66%	1.49%	1.32%	8.88%	2.55%	6.12%	10.45%	5.22%	4.10%	6.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SWSSX and SFLNX in my portfolio?

SWSSX and SFLNX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SWSSX or SFLNX?

SWSSX has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to SFLNX (2.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SWSSX dropped -60.34% vs SFLNX's -56.18%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.