SWRSX vs. VTP
SWRSX (Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.05% expense ratio.
Performance
SWRSX vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SWRSX achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
SWRSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 1.72%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 4.09%
- 5Y*
- 1.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.66%
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SWRSX vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SWRSX Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund | 1.72% | 2.22% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between SWRSX and VTP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.94 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SWRSX vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
SWRSX
VTP
SWRSX vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund (SWRSX) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SWRSX | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.61 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.47 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SWRSX | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.61 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 1.31 | -0.74 |
Drawdowns
SWRSX vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SWRSX drawdown since its inception was -14.29%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SWRSX and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SWRSX | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.29% | -1.92% | -12.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.90% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.30% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.72% | -0.52% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.63% | — | — |
Volatility
SWRSX vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SWRSX | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 3.26% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 3.26% | +2.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.37% | 3.26% | +2.11% |
SWRSX vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SWRSX and VTP have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SWRSX vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
SWRSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SWRSX Schwab Treasury Inflation Protected Securities Index Fund | 3.78% | 4.20% | 3.68% | 3.11% | 7.95% | 4.45% | 1.33% | 2.20% | 2.87% | 1.75% | 1.81% | 1.06% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, SWRSX and VTP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Find the right allocation for SWRSX and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer